Laserfiche WebLink
<br />approval. <br /> <br />31. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical reports prepared <br />by HARZA for the subject development on file with the Planning Department as reviewed <br />and referenced by the City's geotechnical engineer in letters dated January 6, 1995 and <br />January 11, 1995. The applicant's geotechnical consultant shall review and approve all <br />foundation, retaining wall, and drainage geotechnical aspects of the final development <br />plans to ensure that the recommendations have been properly incorporated into the <br />development. The consultant shall certifY by writing on the plans or as otherwise <br />acceptable to the Director of Building Inspection that the final development plan is in <br />conformance with the geotechnical report approved with the project. <br /> <br />32. The applicant shall arrange and pay for the geotechnical consultant to inspect and approve <br />all foundation, retaining walls, and drainage geotechnical aspects of project construction. <br />The consultant shall be present on site during grading and excavation operations. The <br />results of the inspections and the as-built conditions of the project shall be certified in <br />writing by the geotechnical consultant for conformance to the approved plans and <br />geotechnical report and submitted to the City Engineer and Director of Building <br />Inspection for review and approval prior to occupancy. <br /> <br />33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a temporary four (4) foot high fence shall be placed <br />at a minimum distance of ten (10) feet from the top of the creek bank, as shown in the <br />report entitled "Outstanding Geotechnical Issues" prepared by HARZA, dated December <br />20, 1994. At no time shall grading take place within this area, other than grading <br />necessary to prevent drainage from flowing overland into the creek. <br /> <br />34. Prior to grading operations commencing within 20 feet of the creek bank, the geotechnical <br />consultant shall review the grading operations to ensure that the cut-slope will be stable, <br />or that additional methods of stabilization will be implemented to prevent any impact to <br />the creek ban1e Any methods not specifically part of the geotechnical report shall first <br />receive approval by the City Engineer and Planning Director before they are implemented. <br /> <br />35. In conjunction with the final map submittal, a specific on-site soil clean-up plan shall be <br />submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval. This plan shall be consistent <br />with the findings and the recommendations contained with the report entitled, "Preliminary <br />Site Assessment and Soil and Ground Water Quality Evaluation", prepared by HARZA, <br />dated October 11, 1994. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary <br />approval from the Alameda County Health Department, the Water Resources Control <br />Board, and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. <br /> <br />36. Prior to building permit issuance, the site shall be cleaned and signed-off as such by the <br />responsible agencies pursuant to the clean-up plan approved pursuant to Condition <br />Number 34 contained herein. <br /> <br />PUD-94-04 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Conditions Of Approval <br /> <br />Page 5 of 13 <br />