Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Hovingh is concerned about the proliferation of signs for one location, and he <br />sees nothing wrong with the sign ordinance as it currently exists. Once inside the project, <br />the product signs could be used. <br /> <br />Chairman Wright agrees to the proliferation aspect, but feels it is a matter of fairness <br />between the one builder subdivisions and the two or more builder subdivisions. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner McGuirk, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, <br />recommending approval to the City Council of the proposed zoning text amendment, <br />Case RZ-96-06, as listed in Exhibit B, with the following modification: <br /> <br />Add to Section 6: Require all off-site subdivisions signs have property owner's <br />written consent at the time of application. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Lutz, McGuirk, Barker and Chairman Wright <br />Commissioner Hovingh <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-95-26 was entered recommending approval of Case RZ-94-06 to the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Barker requested a resolution to the problem of Ruby Hill logos on <br />City directional signs by the next meeting. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />fuL. Future Plannine Calendar <br />There were none. <br /> <br />8b. Actions of the Citv Council <br />There were none. <br /> <br />~ Actions of the Zonin!! Administrator <br />There were none. <br /> <br />2... COMMUNICA TIONS <br />There were none. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />April 26, 1995 <br />