|
t.814I ;X396
<br /> P'q 1,6 12
<br /> ORDINANCE NO. 264 No. 17 as said Plot No. 17 is shown
<br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING TICE on the map entitled "Map of the
<br /> ANNEXATION Or CERTAIN UN- Pleasanton Homesteads", filed March
<br /> INHABITED TERRITORY, DE^SIG- 7. 1885 in Book 6 of Maps at page
<br /> NATED"ANNEXATION NO.7,NEAL 30 thereof, records of Alameda Coun- L%j
<br /> STREET ANNEX", TO THE CITY ty, California, said point of beginning
<br /> OF PLEASANTON being also on the northern boundary
<br /> BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUN- one Plot the Bernal portion
<br /> CIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASAN- in the a Rancho o el el Valle San Jose
<br /> TON: in Alameda County, California,i as'
<br /> WHEREAS, On June 4, 1956, the said Plot No. 42 is described in the
<br /> Council of the City of Pleasanton did tion decree of partition of the Bernal po
<br /> pass and adopt Resolution No. 2561 tion of the Rancho g recorded de San l
<br /> giving notice of the proposal to an- Jose.2. 869,dinethe office of the County
<br /> nex certain uninhabited territory to Recorder of Alameda County, Cali- I
<br /> the City of Pleasanton, said territory fornia, in Book 40 of Deeds at page
<br /> being therein designated as "Annex- 315 thereof; and running thence along
<br /> ation No. 7, Neal Street Annex", said said boundary line of the City of
<br /> Resolution describing the boundaries Pleasanton South 47° 00'West, 742.00
<br /> of the territory proposed to be an- feet to an angle point therein; thence
<br /> vexed; and continuing along said boundary line
<br /> WHEREAS, said Resolution No. of the City of Pleasanton South 32°
<br /> 2561 did contain a notice of the day, 47' 13"West, 446.64 feet to the south-
<br /> hour and place when and where the erly boundary line of Tract No. 1662
<br /> Council of the City would hear pro- filed September 8, 1955 in Book 36
<br /> tests made by any person owning real of Maps at page 44 thereof, records
<br /> property within the territory pro- of Alameda County.California;thence
<br /> posed to be annexed, the time of said leaving said exterior ioundary line
<br /> hearing being not less than fifteen of the City of Pleasantilh and follow-
<br /> nor more than fifty days from the ing the southerly boundary line of
<br /> date of passage of said Resolution; said Tract 1552 and its direct eaten-
<br /> and sion southeasterly thereof South 86°
<br /> WHEREAS, on July 16, 1956, at the 00' East, 259.98 feet; thence North
<br /> hour of 8:00 P. M., in the Council 70° 00' East, 131.29 feet; thence
<br /> Chambers in the City Hall of the City South 67° 30'East, 205.00 feet; thence
<br /> of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, North 22° 30'East, 534.00 feet; thence
<br /> State of California, said time and North 67° 30'West, 10.00 feet; thence
<br /> place being the day, hour and place North 22° 30' East 250.00 feet; thence
<br /> fixed in said Resolution No. 2561 for North 67° 30' West, 60.88 feet; thence
<br /> hearing protests to the said annexa- North 22° 30' East, 164.18 feet to the
<br /> tion, the said City Council did hear northern line of said Plot 42 of the
<br /> and pass upon all protests made to Bernal Portion of the Rancho el
<br /> the proposed annexation and did de- Valle de San Jose; thence along
<br /> termine that protests had not been northerly line of said Plot 42 of the
<br /> made by the owners of one-half of Bernal Portion of the Rancho el
<br /> the value of the territory proposed Valle de San Jose North 70° 30'West,
<br /> to be annexed as shown by the last 90.12 feet to the point of beginning.
<br /> equalized assessment roll, nor by pub- That written consent having been
<br /> lic and private owners of one-half of filed by owners of all the lands above
<br /> the value of the territory proposed described, said lands shall be taxed
<br /> to be annexed as determined by said to pay indebtedness of the City ex-
<br /> legislative body; and isting and contracted prior to the
<br /> WHEREAS, said territory is con- time of this annexation.
<br /> tiguous to the City of Pleasanton, That pursuant to section 11.6 of
<br /> and is uninhabited territory in the Ordinance 228 (Zoning) of the City
<br /> County of Alameda; of Pleasanton, the City Council does
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the , said hereby designate said territory as a
<br /> Council of the City of Pleasanton; part of the Residential zone and clas-
<br /> does hereby approve the annexation sification for a period of one hundred
<br /> of the territory hereinafter described and twenty (120) days after the fi1-
<br /> to the 'City of Pleasanton, and does ing of a certified copy of this or-
<br /> hereby further ordain that the said nance with the Secretary of State.
<br /> territory be and is hereby annexed to That the City Clerk shall perform
<br /> the City of Pleasanton. all acts necessary to complete this
<br /> That said territory, the annexation annexation.
<br /> of which to the City of Pleasanton ADOPTED: July 23, 1956.
<br /> is herein approved, is all that terra- AYES: Orloff, Trimingham, Cairo.
<br /> tory situate in the County of Ala- NOES: None.
<br /> meda, State of California, more par- ABSENT: Gerton, Hector.
<br /> ticularly described as follows: Signed and approved July 24. 1956. -
<br /> BEGINNING at an angle point in s/ RENO CAIRO, Mayor.
<br /> the exterior boundary line of the ATTEST:
<br /> City of Pleasanton as the same exists s J MARGARET L. CONNER, '
<br /> May 1, 1956. said point of beginning City Clerk. -
<br /> being the southeast corner of Plot Pub. July 26, 1956. • --
<br />. AL94G 12 -
<br /> F r :0R at REQUEST OF I certify that th
<br /> -__ is a correct copy a � •a 6°�
<br /> passed by the City Council of the City of
<br /> Pleas nton, Alameda County, California,
<br /> Att ety_ .
<br /> I�,G 3 Ate -- .' .
<br /> OFFICIAL RECORDS OF b1.aRG F.'r L. CONNER
<br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA City Clerk
<br /> C •
<br /> J !
<br /> COUNTY
<br /> - ` •
<br />
|