My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2004-35
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC-2004-35
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:31 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 3:26:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2004
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2004-35
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-34
NOTES
TOM & TRACEY MILLER
NOTES 3
TO SUBDIVIDE INTO TWO SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2004-35 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF <br />TOM AND TRACEY MILLER FOR PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, <br />AS FILED UNDER CASE PUD-34 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Tom and Tracey Miller have applied for PUD development plan approval to <br />subdivide a 1.9-acre parcel into two new single-family custom home lots at <br />2562 Vineyard Avenue (Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Lot II); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of May 26, 2004, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations ofthe <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that there were no changes to the <br />environmental circumstances and impacts from the time that the Environmental <br />Impact Report for the Vineyard A venue Corridor Specific Plan area was certified <br />that would affect the environmental document; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed project is appropriate for <br />the site; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the PUD development <br />plan: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare. <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e.g., vehicle access, geologic <br />hazards (not within a special studies zone), and flood hazards. The proposed <br />development is designed to be compatible with the adjacent land uses, as well as <br />the General Plan and Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan designations for <br />this site and all other relevant policies and programs. The project has been <br />planned to connect to the planned infrastructure in the Clara Land project <br />consistent with the infrastructure design parameters contained within the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. Therefore, this finding can be made. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.