My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 120804
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 120804
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:47:04 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/8/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 120804
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, and Roberts. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Maas. <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-70 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />f. PUD-37, Ron Winter <br />Application for PUD rezoning and development plan approval for the <br />construction of three single-family residences and four apartment units at <br />520 St. John Street. Zoning for the property is RM-15 (Multiple-Family <br />Residential)/Core Area Overlay District. <br />Also consider the Negative Declaration prepared for the project. <br />This item was continued to January 12, 2005. <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />a. Discussion and yossible action on a draft letter concernine a uronosed ten-lot <br />subdivision at 255 Hanny Vallev Road in Unincoroorated Alameda County <br />Ms. Nerland advised that if every letter sent out by staff on potential projects had to go <br />through Planning Commission and City Council as the final body acting for the City, the <br />City would likely miss a number of deadlines. In this case, there was some extra time to <br />submit comments. She noted that Commissioner Sullivan had wished to discuss this <br />matter. <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that a reporter had called her about this matter before she had <br />received her agenda. She noted that it was awkward because she did not receive the <br />agenda at that time. <br />Ms. Nerland noted that the agenda must be published and posted ten days before the <br />meeting; the packets were typically delivered to the Commissioners the week before the <br />meeting. <br />Chairperson Roberts found nothing wrong with the letter and was glad it was to be sent. <br />Commissioner Blank suggested that the language of the letter be stronger. Ms. Nerland <br />noted that the previous drafts contained milder language. She added that it was important <br />For cities and the County to maintain a collegial, professional relationship. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 8, 2004 Page 15 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.