My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 090804
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 090804
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:46:24 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/8/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 090804
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Fox noted that most gas stations were at the comer of an intersection and noted <br />that stations not at the corner entail a number of turns to return to the original direction of travel. <br />She did not agree that there would be no incremental impact on traffic, especially because the <br />intersection must be traveled twice. Mr. Iserson noted that this station was located on a corner, <br />which helped with access. He described a method of travel that would not entail going through <br />the intersection twice. <br />A discussion of various cut-through routes ensued. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that the section on "Mandatory Findings of Significance," on <br />page 7 of the Negative Declaration described Mr. Iserson's point that the project itself had a very <br />small impact but that it added traffic to a situation that was already very bad. He believed that <br />there should be a "Yes" indication for that paragraph. <br />Mr. Iserson advised that could be tempered if the Commission desired by developing one of the <br />thresholds to determine significance. <br />Commissioner Maas inquired whether the Commission had approved any past projects with a <br />similar LOS. Mr. Iserson replied that he did not recall any new projects; the McDonald's <br />application was a design review of analready-approved project. <br />Commissioner Fox noted that the monument sign appeazed to be twice the height of a person and <br />inquired whether the scale of the illustration was correct. Mr. Iserson noted that the picture was <br />out of proportion and added that the sign was designed to be nine feet high. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether there was a Federal regulation restricting the use of the <br />U.S. flag as a corporate logo. Mr. Iserson noted that the applicant may be able to clarify that <br />question. <br />Commissioner Maas inquired about the effect of the number of pumps and aisles on traffic <br />circulation. Mr. Iserson confirmed that the more aisles and pumps were located in a gas station, <br />the more quickly the traffic turns over and the less backup would exist. <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that page 17 contained an error which referred to "a quick-service <br />restaurant with drive-through." Mr. Iserson confirmed the error. <br />Chairperson Roberts inquired whether the new turn lane and the widening of Stanley Boulevard <br />were taken into consideration in the traffic model. Jeff Knowles confirmed that they were taken <br />into consideration. <br />Chairperson Roberts inquired whether Express Liquors was open 24 hours. Mr. Iserson replied <br />that he did not know. <br />In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts whether diverted trips were counted as new <br />trips, Mr. Iserson replied that they were new trips and that only the pass-by trips were not <br />counted. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 8, 2004 Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.