PC 071404 - Laserfiche WebLink

,-- the facility be set 300 feet back from the residential areas, although some of the wireless providers lobbied to decrease that distance. Overall, the ordinance has worked well, and of the 41 approved wireless facilities in Pleasanton; only one or two applications have been appealed beyond the staff level. Mr. Iserson detailed the more substantive changes: 1. Reducing the park buffer setback from 300 feet to 50 feet; 2. Allowing more antennas by different carriers to be located on or behind roof screens of building; and 3. Eliminating the time frame established at five yeazs for review. Mr. Iserson noted that if a facility were too close to a park, it would constitute an attractive nuisance and create a hazard to children. Staff believed that because of the security requirements and stealth design, it would be appropriate to reduce the setback to the parks by the requested amount of 50 feet. Staff was not aware of any safety issues with respect to wireless facilities and noted that the providers would be able to achieve more coverage in the area. He noted that the roof-mounted antennas on parapets or behind screen walls have not been a visual issue, and the other parts of the ordinance encourage collocation by various providers. Although some of the carriers have requested a reduction of the residential setback, staff would not propose that change. He noted that was the most critical issue for the residents. Staff suggested that the required five-year ordinance review be changed to address a technology change, as determined by the Planning Director. Staff believes that the proposal is acceptable and proposes to keep most of the ordinance intact. The major issue of the residential setback will remain at 300 feet, and no wireless facilities will be allowed in parks. Staff recommends approval of this Code amendment to City Council as shown in Exhibit A. Commissioner Sullivan noted that each company operates its own antenna and inquired whether they could be operated from a common antenna. Mr. Iserson did not believe that could be done due to different technologies but that collocation would be the best solution. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox whether the residents within 300 feet of the parks were noticed, Mr. Iserson noted that they were not. In a response to an inquiry as to whether the Parks and Recreation Commission had agreed to reduce the park buffer from 100 to 50 feet, Mr. Iserson noted that this issue had not been presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Joe Wolfe, 2253 Tanager Drive, noted that his cell phone reception in his house is extremely poor, although he is within a mile of the headquarters of Cingulaz Wireless. He would welcome additional antennas to improve his service. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 2004 Page 13 of 25