Laserfiche WebLink
-- of green building options would also be welcomed by homeowners. She supported the <br />residential green building proposal. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Regarding Question No. 2, Chairperson Roberts believed that the 50-point threshold was <br />acceptable. She believed the ordinance should be reviewed afrer one year and that the <br />issue of raising it should be less restrictive. <br />Commissioner Sullivan agreed with Chairperson Roberts's assessment. He believed that <br />some measures will go down in cost and become more common in the future. He added <br />that the rules were very flexible and had worked very well in collaboration with the <br />development community. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether the 50 points could be the average of all the houses <br />in the development and whether each house in the development must have the same green <br />building features. Commissioner Sullivan replied that each home may have items picked <br />from the list to attain 50 points, but that they did not need to have identical features. <br />Ms. Nerland confirmed that the point total could not be averaged among houses; each <br />house must have 50 points to reach the certified level. <br />Commissioner Kameny concurred with the assessments expressed by Chairperson <br />Roberts and Commissioner Sullivan with respect to the 50-point standard. <br />Commissioner Maas liked the idea of an incentive in developing the point system, such <br />as receiving streamlined processing in the building process. <br />Commissioner Fox suggested that a higher number of points allow a builder to receive a <br />reduction in building fees. <br />Commissioner Sullivan agreed with the use of incentives and noted that during the <br />growth management ordinance heazing, extra units were to be allocated to houses that <br />were "extra green," but the City Council did not adopt that measure. He believed that <br />with respect to this issue, additional units would be allowed if the green building baseline <br />were exceeded by a certain percentage. He noted that market-driven items were not <br />always favorable and believed that in the automotive industry, seatbelts, airbags, and air <br />pollution control devices would not be regulaz features in cazs. He believed that if a <br />reasonable standard was set, the market technologies would follow. He also noted that <br />there are other issues with reducing building fees. <br />Regazding Question No. 3, Chairperson Roberts believed that the implementation of the <br />process had been working well in the City with respect to LEED and green building. The <br />Commission concurred with her assessment. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES July 14, 2004 Page 11 of 24 <br />