My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 060904
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
PC 060904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2017 9:45:32 AM
Creation date
3/16/2005 1:11:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/9/2004
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 060904
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Iserson advised that the Specific Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines had <br />specific discussions about parking structures in the Downtown and how they should be <br />treated architecturally. <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that she favored the rounded buildings and the design with the <br />breezeway. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />There were no speakers. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Mr. Bocian advised that the intent is to develop two full plans to be defined through the <br />workshop process. <br />Commissioner Kameny liked the concept of having City Hall facing Main Street as <br />illustrated in Options 11 and 12. He also liked an attractively designed pazking structure. <br />Chairperson Roberts noted that she liked designs 11 and 12. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that he also liked designs 11 and 12. <br />Commissioner Fox expressed concern about the state of California's budget as well as the <br />amount of public money required to open facilities in the Bernal Property once the design <br />competition has concluded. She would favor the most cost-effective concept and did not <br />want to spend a huge amount of money on City Hall. She also did not want to use the <br />San Francisco property just for surface parking. <br />Commissioner Maas liked the creative ideas on the parking structure, and suggested a <br />community center on the San Francisco property. <br />Commissioner Kameny concurred with Commissioner Fox's budgetary concerns but <br />noted that there were different ways to finance public buildings. He noted that the cities <br />of Concord, Pittsburg, and Antioch had attractive public buildings that were not <br />excessively expensive. <br />Commissioner Sullivan believed that Options 11 and 12 met this criterion but would like <br />to see all pazking off Main Street regardless of which option is chosen. Pedestrian access <br />was important. He suggested placing the round building with the Council Chambers in <br />Centennial Pazk. <br />Commissioner Fox wished to ensure that atwo-story structure would not be <br />overpowering in the Downtown. She noted that Dublin's Civic Center was very lazge <br />and intimidating. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 9, 2004 Page 7 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.