PC 060904 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Commissioner Fox noted that she would like to discuss an emergency item under "Matters Initiated by Commission Members" and that it be moved to the beginning of the meeting. She noted that a business in Pleasanton that provides public services may be closed due to Code enforcement action two weeks prior. Chairperson Roberts suggested that it be heazd at the end of the meeting. Ms. Nerland advised that to discuss the matter in detail or to take action, a determination must be made that it meets the urgency criteria under the Brown Act. Commissioner Maas suggested that Item 7.a., Discussion of "Vision Pleasanton" brochure, be continued until Commissioner Arkin was in attendance. Staff then requested that Item 8.a., Innut on Chazacteristics of New Planning Director, also be continued. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS a. PCUP-112, Achievement Learnine Center Application for conditional use permit approval to operate a private tutorial school in the existing building located at 231 Old Bernal Avenue, Suite 1. Zoning for the property is "O" (Office) Downtown. Revitalization District. Mr. Iserson presented the staff report and summarized the background and scope of the project. He noted that the business has been in operation for several yeazs and that no complaints had been received from the neighbors; however, the use had gone beyond the original approval as an office use for one-on-one tutoring and required a use permit for private schools/tutoring facilities. Staff believed that parking was sufficient and that parking had always been available during site visits. Staff recommended approval of the project. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Mary Kay Berg, applicant, 231 Old Bernal Avenue, Suite 1, wished to correct an item in the staff report and emphasized that they have always had a business license. She noted that the current year's license had not been received because of this pending application. She noted that the business also served high school students. She noted that she was very surprised to find that they were in violation of the Code and would be very happy to comply. She noted that Condition No. 2 referenced a guitaz studio and requested that that be changed. She noted that Condition No. 4 was very restrictive in requiring the presence - of no more than three instructors and five students. She noted that she did not wish to PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 9, 2004 Page 2 of 19