Laserfiche WebLink
Phyllis Ho, 750 Sycamore Creek Way, spoke in support the moratorium. She was concerned <br />about the safety of the Sycamore Creek Way bypass road. She noted that drivers often drove <br />60 miles an hour through the street and through Summit Creek, and some people did not stop at <br />the stop sign. She noted that Lund Ranch II proposed 113 single-family homes, and she was <br />concerned about the children's safety with increased traffic in the area. <br />Chrisand Giles, representing Home Builders Association, which has 1,100 members, noted that <br />she was an advocate for housing and a Pleasanton native vid resident. She expressed concern <br />about the Commission's current action and did not believe the City's residents were under <br />immediate threat to public health, safety, or welfare by the planned development detailed in the <br />Housing Element or the proposed changes to the rezoning in the General Plan Update. She noted <br />that the City stated in its Housing Element that Pleasanton has sufficient infrastructure to <br />accommodate the proposed densities, as described in that General Plan. She acknowledged that <br />the creation of new housing was not comfortable for some, but while the population of <br />Pleasanton has more than tripled since her family first moved to town, she believed that <br />Pleasanton still had a good quality of life. She believed that quality of life could continue with <br />adequate planning and that as long as the residents continued to live long and healthy lives and <br />have families, the community must be expanded. She believed that a moratorium of even two <br />years would affect the price of housing. She believed that the City should focus its efforts on <br />effective implementation of the General Plan zoning changes and continue to build projects to <br />keep the Housing Element validated. <br />Lewis Asbury, Hearst Drive, spoke in support of the moratorium with respect to the larger <br />projects. He hoped the City could continue to support more affordable housing. He did not <br />believe that million-dollar-plus homes should be built until the new General Plan is in place. He <br />supported protecting the remaining hillsides and believed that trying to reduce traffic was a <br />welfare issue. He noted that the current population of 66,000 was close to the target population <br />of approximately 70,000 people. He believed that with the current housing cap, the City's <br />population would probably reach 80,000, which was beyond the original core of focus of the <br />current General Plan. He noted that the traffic in many intersections already exceeded the <br />designated Level-of-Service D, which he believed was in violation of the General Plan. He <br />inquired whether the City had an updated flood plan and expressed concern that the sewer <br />system would be impacted. <br />Sondra Bierre, 980 Riesling Drive, thanked the Commission for the denial of the California <br />Splash application because of traffic. She spoke in support of a moratorium especially in <br />large-scale land use approvals with significant traffic impacts. She would like the Commission <br />to maintain a moratorium until the General Plan update is completed, especially in the south and <br />southeast section of town. <br />Bing Hadley, 1210 Hearst Drive, president of Kottinger Ranch Homeowners Association, spoke <br />in favor of a temporary moratorium on land use approvals. He estimated that with the current <br />approvals, there would already be 27,500 dwellings towards the 29,000 dwellings at buildout. <br />He encouraged prudence in how the City planned the 1,500 dwellings left to be built and how <br />they fit into the overall character of the community. He supported building homes that meet the <br />needs of teachers and civil servants. He expressed concern that the levels of service are in line <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 24, 2004 Page 10 of 22 <br />