Laserfiche WebLink
_ space to non-taxable items like food, the City's tax revenue declines. He noted that the <br />revenue to mitigate the traffic problems and repair the roads would be lost. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Iserson replied that in the past, <br />other stores have included non-taxable food and beverage items for sale, and the City did <br />not have a particular number with respect to the extent of those sales. If WalMart <br />converted to primarily food items, they must return to the Planning Commission and <br />obtain a use permit for a food store, which is a conditional use. <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that a study had been performed by a business group in <br />Orange County that documented the negative effects of superstores on the local economy, <br />especially on smaller stores. He noted that the superstores had much lower prices <br />because of their market power in purchasing. He believed the loss of existing <br />high-paying jobs with benefits would exacerbate that situation and cited the Southern <br />California grocery strikes. He believed this was a social as well as a planning issue and <br />noted that was counter to the efforts to include workforce housing in the community. <br />Commissioner Sullivan believed that having alarge-scale superstore would not be <br />consistent with some of Pleasanton's General Plan goals for local and walkable <br />businesses. He noted that Hacienda Business Park had discussed a redevelopment plan, <br />which included mixed-use, transit-oriented, walkable businesses; he believed they would <br />be very concerned about an adjacent superstore. He did not believe WalMart was a <br />walkable store and supported a diversity of businesses rather than one dominant business. <br />Commissioner Sullivan expressed concern that loss of medical insurance would strain the <br />emergency rooms and the taxpayers. He believed this issue was more urgent than <br />waiting for the General Plan Update. He suggested recommending to the City Council <br />that it hold a public hearing to discuss the issue and decide if it wants to develop a "big <br />box" ordinance in a timely manner. He did not believe the City should be afraid of <br />passing legislation that would benefit the community at large because of the fear of <br />lawsuits. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Kameny, Commissioner Sullivan confirmed <br />that Contra Costa County defined a "big box" store as having a certain percentage of the <br />gross floor space which sold non-taxable items. He agreed with Contra Costa's exclusion <br />of "club stores." <br />Chairperson Roberts advised that she disagreed with Commissioner Sullivan's <br />perspective and noted that Pleasanton did not have the space for a Wa1Mart superstore, <br />and we could control it if we did. She stated that Wa1Mart did offer major medical <br />insurance coverage to its qualified employees. She believed the objections to WalMart <br />were largely labor-driven. She noted that the employees were not covered for everything <br />or what she called "broken-fingernail insurance," as was the issue in the Southern <br />California strikes. She noted that her own insurance premium had increased 28 percent. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 11, 2004 Page 12 of 19 <br />