Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Arkin noted that the LDR land use designation in the NSSP is very clear as being <br />0-2 units per acre for a total of 12 units on the original Backer property. <br />Commissioner Sullivan understood the applicants' argument but believed that the language of <br />the Specific Plan takes precedence, and he agrees with staff s interpretation of the NSSP. <br />Chairperson Roberts moved to deny the appeal, PAP-56, as conditioned in the staff report <br />and subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B. <br />Commissioner Kameny seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolution No. PC-2004-03 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br />Commissioner Arkin excused himself from the meeting, and Commissioner Fox took his place <br />on the dais. <br />The Planning Commission recessed for a break at 9:25 p.m. <br />Chairperson Roberts reconvened the meeting at 9:32 p.m. <br />d. PUD-30/PSP-5, Vallev Park Associates, LLC <br />Application for a PUD rezoning and development plan approval to allow the construction <br />of an approximately 15,300-square-foot office building and related site improvements <br />and for a Specific Plan Amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan to allow atwo-story <br />building where only one-story buildings are permitted. The office building is proposed to <br />have an approximately 12,741-square-foot first floor and an approximately <br />2,559-square-foot second floor. The property is located at 325 Ray Street and is zoned <br />R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residential) District. The Planning Commission will also <br />consider a Negative Declaration for the project. <br />Mr. Iserson presented the staff report and noted that the site was considered to be a transitional <br />site between the Downtown commercial area and the residential area to the east. He noted that <br />the Downtown Specific Plan specified that the development of this site should be cone-story, <br />garden-office type of development. He described the proposed project and noted that public <br />access to the arroyo was encouraged. The applicant proposed the inclusion of a 2,559-square- <br />foot second story, which would require an amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan. <br />Staff believes that the proposed building design met the intent of the Specific Plan in terms of <br />addressing the land use interface between the commercial and residential properties, including <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 14, 2004 Page 12 of 22 <br />