SR 05:069A - Laserfiche WebLink

resulting discrepancy between the fence location and the line location must be resolved in conjunction with the map. Ms. Nerland wished to clarify that the City cannot force the Greenes to giye up some of their property through a lot-line adjustment. The survey and parcel map process will determine the lot line, and if the Bozorgzads, Lambs, and Oreenes decide on a mutual shifting of that line, the City would process that lot-line adjustment. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding the storm water runoff as it concerned the Greenes, Mr. Jost replied that the concrete V-ditch would terminate at Sycamore Creek, and would go through any controls required by Fish & Game or other environmental agencies. He added that Sycamore Creek was part of the storm drain. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts whether solid fences were allowed on the hill, Mr. Pavan replied that open fencing would be placed at the property line at the request of the Greenes; the solid fencing would be allowed along the side property lines. Conunissioner Roberts requested that the solid fencing be changed because it was going up a hill. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. Ed Lamb, Jr. 446 Sycamore Road, applicant, noted that he planned to build a home for his family on one of the subdivided lots and that his father planned to do the same. He acknowledged that the pathway had been a major issue from the beginning, and he wished to clarify that he did not apply for the amendment to remove the sidewalk. After speaking with the neighbors, he believed that they had good reasons to warrant consideration of its removal. He noted that they were not requesting any variances on the project and deliberately stayed within the standards of the North Sycamore Specific Plan; they also made some concessions to the neighbors with respect to additional setbacks, fencework, and lower elevations of some of the homes. He asked the Commission to provide some objective feedback and guidance regarding the outstanding, unresolved issues. In response to Commissioner Blank's question regarding the connection of the northern part of the trail to the existing southern portion, Mr. Lamb stated that the connection went over what would be their and their neighbor's private driveway. There will not be a sidewalk on the private driveway. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank whether the path would cross all three of the driveways, Mr. Lamb replied that the shortest point to the southern section of the sidewalk would be largely in front of the entrance to the Bozorgzads' home. The driveway would be a shared private driveway. Hoss Bozorgzad, 6056 Sycamore Terrace, noted that this project had a ten-year history that had become problematic and detailed its history. He noted that the changes made to his home during the construction phase had become very expensive. He noted that the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 13 of 22