My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:069B
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:069B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2005 1:59:43 PM
Creation date
3/10/2005 12:54:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/15/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:069B
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o One, Make sure and let the potential buyer know that we will be fighting <br /> the path. <br /> (~ Two, since number of times you have mentioned that you feel morally <br /> obligated to repay us for your portion of the improvements. By at least <br /> making the pedestrian path along my lot and your lot #4 acceptable to my <br /> family, you should no longer feel any moral obligation toward us. <br />· 62. From then (mid 2003) we did not hear anything more fi:om you until we <br /> heard fi:om another neighbor in September of 2004, that plans have been <br /> submitted to City. <br />· 63. Upon, review of the plans in the City I immediately contacted you with the <br /> same concerns about the pedestrian pathway. <br />· 64. After a few pleasant conversations on the phone you promised that I would be <br /> contacted by your developer, which did not happen. <br />· 65. I sent you an e-mail expressing our disappointment on being left in the dark <br /> in late September. <br />· 66. After, that we were contacted by Mr. Lamb, which started to escalate the <br /> issue. <br />· 67. I sent you another e-mall on October 2004. Letting you know that Mr. Lamb <br /> as your representative has decided to escalate the matter and forced me into <br /> retaining an attorney. <br />· 68. I got a phone call fi:om you with a promise to call me back in two days. <br />· 69. Have not heard fi:om you directly since. I have only heard Mr. Lambs <br /> understanding of what has happened between us in the past. <br /> <br />Feel flee to let us know if any of these facts are incorrect. <br /> <br />We attempted to be very accommodating and did not force you to pay for one-half of the <br />road improvements because you were not developing yourself. Now you are developing <br />years ahead of when you told us and the Planning Commission you would develop. It is <br />only fair that you make reasonable accommodations to protect our privacy. We have <br />explained to Mr. Lamb what it will take to make the pedestrian path acceptable to protect <br />our privacy: <br /> a. Bow the path away fi:om our property line by about 3 feet along the fi:ont of <br /> the two lots. <br /> b. Do a land exchange to deed about 3 feet along the front of our property to us, <br /> and we would deed about 3 feet along the back of our property to you. <br /> c. Move the City water line over to the new center of the pedestrian path. <br /> d. Install a solid wall along the new property line fi:om the end of our existing <br /> wall forward. <br /> <br />Regards, <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.