My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-96-94
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC-96-94
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:17 AM
Creation date
3/2/2005 3:54:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/20/1996
DOCUMENT NO
PC-96-94
DOCUMENT NAME
FIND AMEND TO DEVELOP AGREE FOR STNRGE REG SHP CTR IN CONFORMANCE WITH PLEASANTON GENERAL PLAN
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-96-94 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION FINDING THE AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT <br />AGREEMENT FOR THE STONERIDGE REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER IS IN <br />CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLEASANTON GENERAL PLAN <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Security Trust Company, as Trustee for Stoneridge Regional Shopping Center has <br />applied for an amendment to the Development Agreement which would: (I) <br />extend the term of the Agreement for five years; (2) allow an additional <br />development of 222,000 square feet (in addition to the 178,000 square feet of <br />approved, but not build, development) of leasable floor area in additional <br />department stores, specialty stores, and/or additional mall stores; (3) establish <br />revised minimum parking ratios; and (4) establish owners' obligations for further <br />traffic mitigation improvements; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is C-R(m) Regional Commercial (enclosed mall) District; <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of November 20, 1996, the Planning <br />Commission after considering all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and <br />recommendations of the City staff concerning this matter, recommended approval <br />of a Negative Declaration prepared for the amendment to the Development <br />Agreement; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Development Agreement as amended is <br />in conformance with the General Plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.