SR 05:062 - Laserfiche WebLink

6.2 Operator Submissions. In connection with each Five Year Compliance Review, the operator shall submit to the County (i) comprehensive information on the record of ALRRF's compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit, (ii)current data and information included in the required reports made pursuant to the California Integrated Waste Management Act, Public Resources Code sections 40050 et. seq., in connection with review of the Solid Waste Fac/lities Permit for ALRRF, (iii) current data and information included in the required reports made to the Regional Water Quality Control Board in connection with review of waste discharge reqairements, and (iv) current data and information included in the most recent air quality report and related monitoring reports for ALRRF. 6.3 Possible CEOA Review Due to Substantial No{mompliance. In the event the Board finds that there has been substantial noncompliance by the operator with any of the permit conditions during the five-year period under review, the County may, in addition to any other recourse the County may have, and provided that such action is allowed pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and sections 15162 and 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines or any other applicable provisions of CEQA, require CEQA review of the non-complying operations prior to any approval of the continuation of such activities. 6.4 Possible CEq)A Review Due to Substantial Changes or Significant New Information. Consistent with the provisions of CEQA, including Public Resources Code section 21166 and sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the County shall require additional CEQA review if, and to the extent, the County finds, based on substantial evidence, that further CEQA review is required pursuant to the terms of Public Resources Code section 21166, and sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines or any other applicable provisions of CEQA. 7. Augmented Board of Supervisors Permit Compliance Review Prior to Mid- Capacity Buildout Point. During that Five Year Compliance Review which is closest in time but prior to that date which the operator projects that fifty percent (50%) of the total approved capacity of the ALRRF expansion will be filled (the "Mid-Capacity Compliance Review"), the County shall conduat a more intensive review of ALRRF's compliance with the Amended Use Permit and based solely on that permit compliance review shall specifically review whether the operator should be allowed to continue operation of the ALRRF and fill the remaining fifty percent (50%) ofthetolal approved capacity of ALRRF. In addition to the requirements for Five Year Reviews set forth in Condition No. 6 above, during the Mid-Capacity Review, the Board of Supervisors shall determine whether ALRRF may continue operations after fifty percent (50%) of ALRRF's total approved capacity has been filled based solely upon its determination that the following conditions have been met: : (i) the operator has requested continued operation of ALRRF; (ii) ALRRF is in compliance with the conditions of this permit; and (iii) there is a demonstrated need for continued operation of the ALRRF based upon consideration of availability other the of technologies or programs for source reduction, reuse or recycling, existing or projected contracts or franchise agreements for disposal 7~A Final Aitamont Settlement - Exhibit A