My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/14/96
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
PC 02/14/96
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 11:52:26 AM
Creation date
2/23/2005 3:33:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/14/1996
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 2/14/96
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright referred to Condition 34 and the construction hours. He is considering <br />modifying the hours except for the fact that the project is to be phased and construction would be <br />ongoing when residents are living there. Mr. Allen stated the phasing is because it is such a <br />large project. They are governed by the growth management of 231 units in 1996 and 231 units <br />in 1997. The applicants are going to ask the Council to allow them to acquire all their building <br />permits at the beginning so they can build the project in a year and a half. They would also <br />support the earlier construction hours. Chairman Lutz noted that there are other apartments <br />across from them. Mr. Allen commented their project will not impact the Signature project and <br />should be built much faster than the Signature project. <br /> <br />Chairman Lutz inquired how they plan to manage the garage situation. Mr. Allen stated staff s <br />concern is also their concern. Their other projects impose a penalty if residents use the garage <br />for storage. He also noted that the units have a larger amount of storage than most apartments. <br /> <br />Commissioner McGuirk inquired what schools the children living in this project would attend. <br />Mr. Sweeney advised that they would go to either the new Stoneridge elementary, Pairlands or <br />Donlon. <br /> <br />Robert Gray, 2350 Willet Way, feels this project is needed in Pleasanton. His children are not <br />able to live in Pleasanton because of the high rents. As an employer in Pleasanton, he would like <br />to see this project go forward because his employees have to commute due to the area's high <br />rental rates and the limited availability of rentals. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright inquired of staff regarding Condition 5 and Condition 55. Mr. Iserson <br />would like to leave Condition 5 as written, however, Condition 55 could be written that "No <br />more access to this project shall be permitted on Owens Drive." <br /> <br />Commissioner Hovingh inquired if the flowering plum is an evergreen or deciduous tree. Mr. <br />Israel advised that it is a deciduous tree. Commissioner Hovingh suggested the Owens Drive <br />berm area have a wider variety of tree species. <br /> <br />Chairman Lutz favors this application because it is an attractive project, it is important to have <br />housing in this area, it is close to BART, and because there is a portion reserved for low income <br />housing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Barker feels that in an effort to plan for future residents of Pleasanton, <br />Pleasanton's current residents are being ignored because there is not enough park space to <br />accommodate the City's needs. She would rather see higher priced housing with more land <br />dedicated to parks. The other Commissioners did not agree with her sentiment, feeling the <br />community needs all ranges of housing. Commissioner Barker cannot support this project <br /> <br />because of the lack of support of the City parks. Commissioner Wright commented that <br />everything comes down to the issue of money, and the City just didn't have the money in the <br />budget to acquire the acreage for a community park, <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />February 14, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.