My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/19/97
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC 11/19/97
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2013 1:02:43 PM
Creation date
2/9/2005 1:57:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/19/1997
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/19/97
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />". <br />\ <br />,\ <br /> <br />Commissioner Kumaran stated that he agrees with Chair Cooper in that he would like to see the <br />developer share the cost of undergrounding utilities along Sycamore Road. Jerry Iserson stated <br />that the Commission could recommend this under the fmancing plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Barker noted that she supports Plan B for the "A" Street setbacks and agrees with <br />Mr. Dingman that workshops should be held to work out the details satisfactorily. However, <br />she feels that the Commission should continue their vote on this issue because there are so many <br />details that need to be worked out, especially with the existing property owners. She agrees with <br />staff that lots 5, 6, 13, 41, 42, and 43 should all have single-story homes. She supports <br />undergrounding the utilities along Sycamore Road by the developer. She wants the existing <br />neighbors to be in a good bargaining position when they go into negotiations with Greenbriar <br />on all issues. She also agrees with staff's recommendations regarding the Lighting and <br />Landscaping District, but will also agree to add some language allowing the developer to <br />proceed with the plan upon approval by the City Attorney. Finally, Commissioner Barker <br />related that she does not support the City contributing to .. A" Street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright stated that he will support Greenbriar's recommendation to remove <br />Condition 27 requiring single-story homes on lots 12, 13, 41, and 43. He would also like to <br />delete Condition 2b relating to the v-ditches and noted that the existing neighbors already have <br />adequate draining systems. Mr. Wright acknowledged the members of the audience who gave <br />their comments. He noted that concessions for the Greenes were made in the early 90's by <br />lowering the road to minimize the encroachment to the Greene's property. With regard to the <br />safety issue raised by the Greenes, he believes that the City Traffic Department and Greenbriar's <br />advisor is qualified to say that there is no real safety problem. Mr. Wright stated the he <br />supports the project and will agree to Plan A. With regard to the landscaping district and the <br />setback issue, he will support staff's recommendations. As far as undergrounding utilities, he <br />thinks it's unfair to ask the developer to fund them a this point in the project. Finally, <br />Commissioner Wright agrees with staff that an evaluation needs to be conducted related to the <br />fair division of the cost of "A" Street. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Lutz stated that his is impressed with the project and the design of the homes. <br />He stated that this is an important project because it will set the tone for the entire area. <br />However, he is concerned that only approximately 10% of the city residents would be able to <br />afford a home in this community. With regard to the road proposals, he feels that each one <br />could be safely constructed, and he believes the deciding factor should be what is most equitable <br />for the people affected. He commented that he has not had the time or knowledge to make a <br />decision on the road issue tonight and would, therefore abstain his vote on that issue. He would <br />like to see that issue continued in order to allow some further negotiations. Commissioner Lutz <br />feels that larger backyard would be more useful to the homeowners and would, therefore, <br />support the developer's request to reduce the amount of the setback. He feels that issue 2b <br />should be removed in it's entirety. He supports staff's recommendation for Condition 21 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 16 <br /> <br />November 19, 1997 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.