Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a corporate meeting room during daytime hours, no music, beer and wine served with luncheon. <br />However, as presented, he cannot support the special events center or the request for a caretaker <br />residence. <br /> <br />Chair Barker stated that Dr. Araj alluded that the developer was led to believe by staff that this was <br />a good use and would be supported the City. She feels this has happened in the past, but presently, <br />the Council lets the public hearing process proceed and listens to the people. <br /> <br />Technically, staff must take each application as presented anew; however, she feels staff must look <br />at the business relationship with the developer and considered disingenuous dealings in the past. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright stated that he was on the Planning Commission during the past administration, <br />and they did not do any more favors than does the present administration. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, that the three use permit <br />findings cannot be found and to deny Case UP-96-08. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Kumaran, Lutz, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-40 was entered denying Case UP-96-08, as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, finding there is no basis <br />for PUD-85-15-7M and denied the application. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Kumaran, Lutz, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-41 was entered denying Case PUD-85-15-7M, as motioned. <br /> <br />In an effort for everyone to work together, Commissioner Cooper suggested the Commission make <br />a motion to the City Council to rezone this property. Commissioner Wright feels that may be <br />premature because the applicant has the right to appeal this decision. Mr. Iserson advised that since <br />the applications were denied, the only way the City Council would hear the applications would be <br />through an appeal. He further advised that the Commission could direct staff to initiate a PUD <br />modification to create new allowed uses on the site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper motioned, seconded by Commissioner Lutz, directing staff to prepare <br />a PUD modification. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />May 14, 1997 <br /> <br />~--_.__...,-,-~--_._..~---,._--'----_._--_.__._-- - -- ......- - <br />