Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Wright motioned, seconded by Commissioner Cooper, approving Case PUD.81. <br />30-69D, subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Dove, Lutz, and Wright <br />Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-18 was entered approving Case PUD-81-30-69D, as motioned. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson clarified that if the construction hours are changed, staff is to notify the residential <br />neighbors of such change and to direct any complaints to the Planning Director. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />a. Discussion of Growth Manal!ement Issues <br /> <br />Connnissioner Cooper motioned, seconded by Connnissioner Dove, for the City Council to <br />address the growth management issue as a priority, such that there is an orderly progression <br />to build out. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Cooper, Dove, Lutz, Wright and Chair Barker <br />None <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC 97-19 was entered requesting the City Council to address growth <br />management issues, as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper would also like to review the Affordable Housing Guidelines. He wants the <br />City Council to know that the Planning Commission has not discussed the Affordable Housing fee <br />waiver and wants to do so as an agenda item. It will be on the next agenda. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cooper noted that the lights at Moller Ranch entrance are brighter than the city <br />streets. Staff noted that others have brought up this issue and it is being directed to the appropriate <br />staff. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br /> <br />a. Future Planninl! Calendar <br />There were none. <br /> <br />Page 29 <br /> <br />February 12. 1997 <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />