SR 05:023 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT revenue came from food. She stated that most of the alcohol consumed was by people dining and emphasized that was the core business. She noted that contemporary and classic rock was preferred and that the volume would be kept at an appropriate level. She added that hip-hop or techno music would not be played in order to attract a slightly older crowd. She noted that she carefully monitored the live bands' volume during their performances and added that it was very important for the business to be considerate of the surrounding neighborhood and to ensure that its patrons were kept under control as well, particularly in the outdoor dining areas. She would be able to bring outdoor diners inside after the outdoor closing time. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin about the operator's previous proposal to locate the business at 780 Main Street, Ms. Keimard advised that she was unable to come to an agreement with the owner. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding diners under the age of 21, Ms. Kennard replied that they are very careful about I.D. She noted that minors normally dined with their parents or in a family group, which was a common occurrence. Roy Moret, 739 Main Street/129 Sand Wedge, Walnut Creek, advised that he owned and managed the Los Pilares building at 739 Main Street and supported the proposed project. He strongly urged continued monitoring of the conditions if approved. He believed the conditions would serve the good of the community and believed the use would be beneficial to Downtown Pleasanton. He read a letter into the record from a former tenant, whom he lost in August after 11 years: "Dear Roy, After much consideration, weighing all pros and cons, we have made the painful decision not to renew our lease here at 739 Main Street when it expires on July 31. It was not an easy decision to make, nor is this an easy letter to write. The pub next door continues to be the one and only reason for our need to relocate our offices. The conditions in the rear of the pub and in the parking lot remain unacceptable. We do appreciate what you have done for us in this unfortunate situation, and we have enjoyed our tenancy here. Thank you for all that you have done for us." Mr. Moret noted that his tenants had experienced numerous incidences of vandalism and harassment resulting from their proximity to the Union Jack Pub. He urged the Commission to require an additional review upon each change of management or ownership. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts about the age range of patrons at the Union Jack, Mr. Moret replied that one patron who caused a disturbance was in his late 30's. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Roberts regarding the Union Jack, Ms. Kline replied that she had spoken with Jeff Bretzing, Senior Code Enforcement Officer, who stated that there had been police surveillance at that establishment. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Kline confirmed that the Union Jack had a conditional use permit. DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, December 8, 2004 Page 2 of 4