Laserfiche WebLink
contemplated construction of the interchange resulted in sound wall construction lining this <br />road segment but no need to widen the road at that time. <br /> <br />Any widening of this roadway segment would likely fall on the City sources: local traffic fee <br />and General Fund. <br /> <br />Model Output <br /> <br />To analyze the pros and cons of widening this roadway from a traffic perspective, the traffic <br />forecasting model was used to study roadway users during the morning and evening peak hour <br />to assess: <br /> Who would use the widened roadway (local or cut-through)? <br /> · Where were Pleasanton drivers coming from or going to as they used the road? <br /> · What was the purpose of the trip (work, school, shop, recreation, etc.)? <br /> · What impact did the roadway widening have on driving times and driving distances for <br /> local drivers? <br /> · How did the roadway widening effect traffic volumes at 135 City intersections? <br /> · How did the roadway widening effect cut-through traffic in Pleasanton? <br /> <br />The following is a summary of the traffic forecast model outputs. <br /> <br />Morning Peak Hour West Las Positas Boulevard Users <br />The following map shows that about 1,700 Pleasanton drivers would use the section of West Las <br />Positas Boulevard just west of 1-680 during the morning peak hour if the roadway were widened <br />as part of the 1996 General Plan Roadway Network. In addition to these local users, about 70 <br />cut-through drivers would use this roadway, primarily in the westbound direction. <br /> <br />The volume of traffic on this segment is generally not great enough to require four lanes. <br />However, widening at the future signalized intersection at Muirwood Drive should be <br />considered to make the intersection sufficiently efficient to avoid diversion of local trips onto <br />collector streets. <br /> <br />SR 05:027 <br />Page 59 <br /> <br /> <br />