My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 05:027
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2005
>
SR 05:027
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2005 3:59:07 PM
Creation date
1/5/2005 10:48:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/11/2005
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 05:027
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Avenue to create a 2-lane divided road on a temporary basis to address traffic calming, safety, <br />and vehicle noise issues along the corridor. The City has also timed the traffic signal at <br />Vineyard Avenue and Ruby I-Iill Boulevard to limit the amount of traffic that can enter the City <br />from the east during the morning peak hour. <br /> <br />The 1996 General Plan Roadway Network traffic model included the wider roadway features <br />mentioned previously, and the intersection lane geometry shown in Figure 111-7. The model did <br />assume continued metering of inbound traffic in the morning from the east. With this lane <br />geometry, the model forecasts LOS C conditions at the intersection of Bemal Avenue at <br />Vineyard Avenue during the morning peak hour and LOS D conditions in the evening. <br /> <br />Like many of the other wide roadway segments in the City, this section was designed when a <br />four-lane Vineyard Avenue segment would have extended all the way to Ruby Hill, with much <br />more intensive development planned. <br /> <br />The roadway is presently sufficiently wide for a divided four-lane road until the approach to <br />Montevino Drive. The median has generally not been installed. The right-of-way narrows at <br />Montevino Drive, and from there to Clara Lane, it is a high-capacity tow-lane road (with <br />protect left-mm lane) pursuant to the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. Any widening <br />of this section would be constrained. Funding for any revisions would be from City resources <br />as there is no direct development which would contribute to any changes here. <br /> <br />To analyze the pros and cons of the providing a 4-lane section along this portion of Vineyard <br />Avenue from a traffic perspective, the traffic forecasting model was used to study roadway users <br />during the morning and evening peak hour to assess: <br /> <br />· Who would use the 4-lane roadway (local or cut-through)? <br />· Where were Pleasanton drivers coming from or going to as they used the road? <br />· What was the purpose of the trip (work, school, shop, recreation, etc.)? <br />· What impact did the additional lanes have on driving times and driving distances for local <br /> drivers? <br />· How did the 4-lane roadway affect traffic volumes at 135 City intersections? <br />· How did the 4-lane roadway affect cut-through traffic in Pleasanton? <br /> <br />The following is a summary of the traffic forecast model outputs. <br /> <br />Morning Peak Hour 4-lane Vineyard Avenue Users <br />The following map shows that about 1,000 Pleasanton drivers would use the 4-lane section of <br />Vineyard Avenue if it were striped as shown in the 1996 General Plan Roadway Network. <br />About 30 cut-through vehicles would use the roadway during the morning peak hour. This cut- <br />through volume is restricted by the traffic signal at Ruby Hill Boulevard. The roadway acts as <br />the sole link between Ruby Hill and the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan Area and the rest of the <br /> <br />SR 05:027 <br />Page 50 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.