My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
052825 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PARKS AND RECREATION
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2025
>
MAY 8, 2025
>
052825 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2025 10:27:55 AM
Creation date
5/12/2025 10:27:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 3 of 5 <br />Gym Rental Fees <br />Co-sponsor gym rentals have been evaluated using the same cost recovery methodology as <br />all other programs and services. Similar to co-sponsor field rentals, this category also receives <br />a substantial subsidy compared to other rental groups. <br /> <br />Unlike co-sponsor field users, co-sponsor gym groups have historically paid an hourly rate for <br />gym use. As service delivery costs have increased over time, the hourly rate for gym rentals <br />has also been adjusted accordingly, resulting in a lower overall subsidy than field rentals. <br /> <br />While the rate remains subsidized to reflect the community benefit provided by these groups, it <br />more closely aligns with the maximum subsidy of other co-sponsor rental categories. Staff will <br />continue to monitor service costs and consider future adjustments to ensure continued <br />alignment with the updated model and the City’s fiscal sustainability objectives. <br /> <br />Field Light Rates <br />To improve cost recovery and reflect the true cost of service delivery, a new table outlining <br />maximum subsidies for field lighting based on actual costs of each field has been added to the <br />Proposed MFS (Attachment 2). Over the past decade, field light fees have only increased by <br />$3 per hour, despite substantial rises in electricity rates. As a result, the current fee structure <br />no longer aligns with actual utility costs. The proposed structure would result in a significant <br />hourly rate adjustment to align with true costs. While the proposed increase is considerable, it <br />is necessary to ensure that light usage fees better reflect the true cost of providing this service <br />and help offset the rising expenses associated with electricity. Fees would be given a <br />maximum general fund subsidy by rental category and updated each July 1 to reflect actual <br />costs. <br /> <br />Facility/Picnic Rental Fees <br />In this proposed model, facility and picnic fees will be assessed using the same framework <br />applied in the updated cost recovery model. Rental categories will be given a maximum <br />general fund subsidy based on their impact on the community and universal value. Rentals <br />with greater public benefit are eligible for higher subsidy levels, while those with limited <br />community impact are given lower to no subsidies (Attachment 2). This is accomplished <br />through user categories, with co-sponsored user groups receiving the highest GF subsidy <br />(40%), followed by non-profits (30%), residents (20%), and then non-residents and businesses <br />(0%). <br /> <br />Refunds <br />Current practice stipulates that requests for refunds submitted at least ten days prior to the <br />start of the class or program will be issued a full refund and those submitted at least five <br />business days before the start of a program will be subject to a $5 administrative fee. No <br />refunds are issued for requests received less than five days prior to the start of the program. <br /> <br />The recommended policy removes the full refund prior to ten days before the start of the <br />program. Many people register for multiple programs and then cancel all but one. This limits <br />access to registration for other community members, and it is labor-intensive for staff to issue <br />refunds. In the proposal, all refund requests submitted at least seven calendar days before the <br />program or class start date will be charged a $10 fee. The change to seven days versus five <br />business days is intended to honor the concept of one week, while reducing confusion to the <br />customer. No refunds will be issued less than seven days prior to the start of the program. <br />Page 15 of 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.