Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br />DISCUSSION <br />Preliminary General Fund Budget Reduction Proposals <br />As discussed above, the preliminary General Fund reduction proposals were developed <br />using the projected deficit numbers ($10.4 million in Year 1 and $12.0 million in Year 2) <br />from the ten-year financial forecast previously presented to the City Council. These <br />proposals, along with other budget balancing options and potential limited use of one- <br />time funding, are included in this preliminary recommendation as part of the overall <br />strategy to achieve a balanced two-year budget. It should be emphasized that the use <br />of one-time funds is an interim solution and does not address the ongoing structural <br />deficit. As advised by the City’s actuarial consultant, consistent use of one-time funds, <br />such as Section 115 Pension Trust and/or OPEB Trust, could deplete the trusts <br />prematurely, resulting in persistent high unfunded pension and retiree medical liabilities <br />(higher overall expenses) and low funded status. <br /> <br />Use of Reserves and Other “One-time Money” <br />The City Council received a report on potential strategies, risks, and benefits of utilizing <br />pension trust funds in the near term at its March 4, 2025, City Council meeting. <br />https://pleasantonca.portal.civicclerk.com/event/386/files/report/1933. <br />That report outlined a number of options for one-time funds. Other than the $2.0 million <br />in one-time funding from the Section 115 Pension trust already authorized by the City <br />Council, use of additional one-time funds is not recommended at this time. <br /> <br />Section 115 Pension Trust and OPEB <br />The City’s Pension Trust funds retirement benefits and the Other Post-Employment <br />Benefits (OPEB) account funds retiree medical benefits. The City’s actuary <br />recommended not using any of the funds that had been set aside in the Section 115 <br />Pension Trust until the obligation is 100% funded. For the OPEB account, the actuary <br />recommended that the City should continue to fund the required contribution until the <br />obligation is 100% funded, and the use of funds should be limited to the amounts <br />determined in the actuarial valuation reports. However, the actuary acknowledged that <br />the City is in a challenging financial situation. On March 4, 2025, the City Council voted <br />to authorize staff to develop a budget that would use up to $2.0 million of Section 115 <br />Trust funding in FY 2025/26 and another $2.0 million in FY 2026/27. In future years, the <br />use of these funds will be considered on a rolling basis. <br /> <br />It should be noted that the funded ratio for the City’s pension plans is only 68.2% <br />without the pension trust funds, which is below the state average. With the <br />supplemental trust, the funded ratio is 75.0%, which is in line with the state average. <br />Use of the trust funds at any level could see the City’s funded status decrease. <br /> <br />The OPEB plans have a much lower liability (in real dollars), and the funded ratio is <br />about 81.0%. The City was able to achieve this funded status without withdrawing <br />significant amounts from the trust accounts since the establishment of these accounts. <br />While it is possible to withdraw funds from this account, it is not recommended at this <br />Page 6 of 40