My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 2292
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
2201 - 2300
>
ORD 2292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 4:48:58 PM
Creation date
3/25/2025 4:24:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2025
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORDINANCE NO. 2292 <br /> AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ADDING <br /> SECTION 1.04.120 TO CHAPTER 1.04 OF THE PLEASANTON MUNICIPAL CODE <br /> ESTABLISHING AN ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES PROCEDURE FOR CHALLENGES <br /> TO FEES, CHARGES, AND ASSESSMENTS <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS <br /> FOLLOWS: <br /> SECTION 1. Chapter 1.04 of Title 1 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code is hereby <br /> amended to add a new section 1.04.120 to read as follows: <br /> 1.04.120 Exhaustion of administrative remedies for challenges to fees, <br /> charges, and assessments on real property. <br /> A. Scope. The duty to exhaust administrative remedies imposed by this section extends to.. <br /> 1. any fee or charge subject to articles XIII C or XIII D of the California Constitution, <br /> 2. any assessment on real property levied by the City, and <br /> 3. the methodology used to develop and levy such a fee, charge, or assessment. <br /> B. "Hearing" as used in this section means the hearing referenced in paragraph 4 of <br /> subsection D of this section. <br /> C. Duty to Exhaust Issues. No person may bring a judicial action or proceeding alleging <br /> noncompliance with the California Constitution or other applicable law for any new, increased, or <br /> extended fee, charge, or assessment levied by the City, unless that person submitted to the City <br /> Clerk a timely, written objection to that fee, charge, or assessment specifying the grounds for <br /> alleging noncompliance. The issues raised in any such action or proceeding shall be limited to <br /> those raised in such an objection unless a court finds the issue could not have been raised in such <br /> an objection by those exercising reasonable diligence. <br /> D. Procedures. The City shall: <br /> 1. Make available to the public any proposed fee, charge, or assessment to which this <br /> section is to apply no less than 45 days before the deadline for a ratepayer or assessed property <br /> owner to submit an objection pursuant to paragraph 4 of this subsection D. <br /> 2. Post on its internet website a written basis for the fee, charge, or assessment, such <br /> as a cost of service analysis or an engineer's report, and include a link to the internet website in <br /> the written notice of the Hearing, including, but not limited to, a notice pursuant to subdivision (c) <br /> of Section 4 or paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 6 of Article XIII D of the California <br /> Constitution. <br /> 3. Mail the written basis described in paragraph 2 of this subsection D to a ratepayer <br /> or property owner on request. <br /> 4. Provide at least 45 days for a ratepayer or assessed property owner to review the <br /> proposed fee or assessment and to timely submit to the City Clerk a written objection to that fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.