Laserfiche WebLink
Ordinance No. 2287 <br /> Page 17 of 21 <br /> Any off-site alternative must comply with the density, intensity and other development <br /> standards that are permitted under the zone for the site. <br /> E. Land Dedication. Upon approval by the city council, an applicant may dedicate land to the city <br /> or a qualified nonprofit housing developer in place of actual construction of inclusionary units <br /> upon approval of the city council. The intent of allowing a land dedication option is to provide <br /> the city or a local nonprofit housing developer the free land needed to make an inclusionary unit <br /> development feasible, thus furthering the intent of this chapter. The following criteria shall be <br /> met for any dedication of land: <br /> 1. The dedicated land must be appropriately zoned, buildable, free of toxic substances, <br /> contaminated soils, or geologic or other physical constraints that make it unsuitable for <br /> residential development. <br /> 2. The developable area of the site is large enough to accommodate the number of inclusionary <br /> units required for the project. The city's acceptance of land dedication shall require that the lots <br /> be fully improved, with infrastructure, adjacent utilities, grading, and fees paid. <br /> 3. The land is appraised by the city at a value equal to or greater than the in-lieu-fee in place at time <br /> of the market-rate project application, multiplied by the number of required inclusionary units <br /> that would be satisfied by construction of units on the land to be dedicated. If the appraised <br /> value is less than the in-lieu fee, the developer shall be subject to payment of the difference as a <br /> cash contribution to the Affordable Housing Fund. <br /> F. Affordable Housing Fee. In lieu of providing inclusionary units in a project, the city council may <br /> approve payment of the city's affordable housing fee, as set forth in Chapter 17.40 of this title. <br /> Such alternative shall only be approved if the city council determines that: <br /> 1. The proposal would be consistent with and further the purpose of this chapter, as set forth in <br /> Section 17.44.020. <br /> 2. Greater benefit would accrue to the City's with respect to furthering affordable housing and <br /> the ability to provide housing affordable to all segments of the community through payment of <br /> the fee, versus requiring construction of the units on-site. <br /> 3. Projects requesting a density bonus, incentive or concession, waiver, or parking ratio under <br /> Government Code Section 65915 or Chapter 17.38 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code shall not <br /> be permitted to pay in-lieu fees as an alternative to satisfying the affordable housing <br /> requirements of this Chapter. Payment of fees in lieu of providing affordable units under <br /> Chapter 17.44 of the Code does not qualify a housing development for a density bonus. <br /> G. Other Alternate Methods of Compliance. Applicants may propose other creative concepts for <br /> meeting the requirements of this chapter, in order to bring down the cost of providing <br /> inclusionary units, whether on- or off-site. The city council may approve such alternate methods <br /> of compliance with this chapter if the applicant demonstrates that such alternate method meets <br /> the purpose of this chapter(as set forth in Section 17.44.020 of this chapter). <br /> (Ord. 1818 § 1, 2000) <br />