Laserfiche WebLink
Table 1: For-Sale Projects (Single-Family Detached) - Revised Inclusionary <br />Scenarios) <br /> Inclusionary <br />Rate <br />Affordability <br />Mix <br />In-Lieu <br />Fee/Square <br />Foot*. <br />Equivalent <br />In-Lieu <br />Fee/Unit <br />Existing IZO 20% 120% AMI $17.40 $52,203 <br />Maximum <br />Feasible Fee <br /> $67.38 $202,151 <br />Scenario 1 <br />(Recommended) <br />15% 120% AMI $126.38 $379,134 <br />Scenario 2 20% 120% & 150% <br />AMI <br />$159.28 $477,838 <br /> <br />* Assumes typical single-family detached home size of 3,000 sq. ft. <br /> <br />Table 2: For-Sale Projects (Townhomes) – Revised Inclusionary Scenarios <br /> Inclusionary <br />Rate <br />Affordability <br />Mix <br />In-Lieu <br />Fee/Square <br />Foot* <br />Equivalent <br />In-Lieu <br />Fee/Unit <br />Existing IZO 20% 120% AMI $26.10 $52,203 <br />Maximum <br />Feasible Fee <br /> $45.57 $91,144 <br />Scenario 1 <br />(Recommended) <br />15% 120% AMI $42.10 $84,190 <br />Scenario 2 20% 120% & 150% <br />AMI <br />$47.59 $95,174 <br />*Assumes typical townhome size of 1,800 sq. ft. <br /> <br />Conclusions/Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends Scenario 1 (15% Inclusionary Rate/120% AMI) for both single- <br />family detached and townhome projects, for the following reasons: <br /> <br /> The 15% rate is the most feasible for for-sale townhomes and detached single- <br />family homes. Consistent with the ODS, this allows the City to set the affordability <br />limit at 120% AMI, a moderate-income rate that will contribute toward meeting <br />that RHNA segment. <br /> <br /> The City could consider varying the inclusionary percentage for detached single- <br />family homes versus townhomes (i.e., 15% for single-family detached projects, <br />and 20% for townhomes). However, a consistent approach will be more <br />straightforward to implement, and will avoid developers attempting to seek <br />loopholes (for example, building zero-lot line units that are technically detached <br />to qualify for the lower inclusionary rate). <br /> <br /> As shown in Table 5, below, the 15% rate is comparable to peer cities surveyed, <br />including Livermore, Dublin and Fremont; other cities surveyed (Walnut Creek, <br />Danville and San Ramon) have rates or 10% or less. <br /> <br />Page 8 of 40