Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />In brief, the report and CEQA review found that, although a portion of the site <br />is located within a designated Fault Zone, there are no faults located within <br />the site itself. The project would be required to comply with Building Code <br />standards and other standards that address seismic hazards and risk more <br />generally, and per the Housing Element EIR, impacts related to geologic <br />hazards were found to be less than significant. Per the checklist analysis, <br />based on the geology report, no site- or project-specific hazards were found <br />with respect to seismic or other related geotechnical hazard that were unique <br />to the site and not analyzed in the Housing Element EIR; only one mitigation <br />measure, MM GEO-6, related to paleontological resources, was found to be <br />applicable to the project. This mitigation measure has been included in the <br />recommended project Conditions of Approval (COAs). COA 68 (Geotechnical <br />Recommendations); COA 69 (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act) <br />and COA 94 (Geotechnical Final Report) address appropriate geotechnical <br />design to address on-site soils and geotechnical conditions. <br /> <br />Based on the above-referenced analysis and conditions of approval, staff <br />concludes that all geotechnical hazards will be properly addressed. <br /> <br />