Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT 2024 Legislative Positions <br /> <br />4 | P a g e <br />Updated 4.17.2024 <br /> Bill # and Title Description Recommended <br />City Position <br />TVC <br />Position/League <br />Position <br />Transportation Improvement Program or applicable regional <br />transportation plan. The bill would also prohibit local agency from <br />imposing a land dedication requirement, as defined, on a housing <br />development for the purpose of mitigating vehicular traffic impacts <br />or achieving an adopted level of service related to vehicular traffic. <br /> <br />6 SB 393 (Glazer) <br /> <br />California <br />Environmental Quality <br />Act: judicial <br />challenge: <br />identification of <br />contributors: <br />housing projects. <br /> <br />For the purposes of a CEQA lawsuit, this bill would authorize a <br />defendant, in an action brought pursuant to the act relating to a <br />housing development project, to file a motion requesting the <br />plaintiff or petitioner to identify every person or entity that <br />contributes in excess of $10,000, as specified, toward the plaintiff’s <br />or petitioner’s costs of the action. <br /> <br />Support None/Watch <br />7 SB 450 (Atkins) <br /> <br />Housing <br />development: <br />approvals. <br />Amends SB 9 as follows: <br /> <br />• Would remove the requirement that a proposed housing <br />development does not allow for the demolition of more than <br />25% of the existing exterior structural walls to be considered <br />ministerially. <br />• Would prohibit a local agency from imposing objective zoning <br />standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective <br />design standards that do not apply uniformly to development <br />within the underlying zone but would specify that these <br />provisions do not prohibit a local agency from adopting or <br />imposing objective zoning standards, objective subdivision <br />standards, and objective design standards on the development <br />if the standards are more permissive than applicable standards <br />within the underlying zone. <br />• Would remove the authorization for a local agency to deny a <br />proposed housing development if the building official makes a <br />Oppose Unless <br />Amended. <br /> <br />(Limits ability to <br />apply objective <br />standards to SB 9 <br />projects; broadens <br />scope of projects <br />eligible for SB 9, and <br />removes ability to <br />deny a project <br />based on adverse <br />environmental <br />impacts; shortens <br />approval timelines) <br />None/Watch <br />Page 73 of 448