My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET REGULAR
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
0507
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET REGULAR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 1:01:59 PM
Creation date
7/9/2024 12:56:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/7/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT 2024 Legislative Positions <br /> <br />2 | P a g e <br />Updated 4.17.2024 <br /> Bill # and Title Description Recommended <br />City Position <br />TVC <br />Position/League <br />Position <br />3 AB 2904 (Quirk- <br />Silva) <br /> <br />Zoning ordinances: <br />Notice <br /> <br />Requires 60-day notice to property owner when re-zoning prior to <br />the hearing on the ordinance or amendment where it is currently a <br />10-day notice prior to the hearing on the ordinance or amendment. <br />Oppose unless <br />amended <br /> <br />(Increases burden <br />and creates more <br />strict timelines for <br />already time-bound <br />process, in the <br />instance of a <br />required re-zone to <br />meet No Net Loss <br />requirements) <br /> <br />None/Track <br />4 AB 3068 (Haney) <br /> <br />Adaptive reuse: <br />streamlining: <br />incentives. <br />This bill would deem an adaptive reuse project a use by right in all <br />zones, regardless of the zoning of the site, and subject to a <br />streamlined, ministerial review process if the project meets <br />specified requirements. In this regard, an adaptive reuse project, in <br />order to qualify for the streamlined, ministerial review process, <br />would be required to be proposed for an existing building that is <br />less than 50 years old or meets certain requirements regarding the <br />preservation of historic resources, including the signing of an <br />affidavit declaring that the project will comply with the United States <br />Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or receive <br />federal or state historic rehabilitation tax credits, as specified. The <br />bill would require an adaptive reuse project to comply with any <br />broadly applicable housing affordability requirement, as defined, <br />adopted by the local government and would require at least one- <br />half of the square footage of the adaptive reuse project to be <br />dedicated to residential uses, unless the project is an office <br />conversion project, as specified. The bill would authorize an <br />adaptive reuse project subject to these provisions to include the <br />development of new residential or mixed-use structures on <br />undeveloped areas and parking areas on the parcels adjacent to <br />the proposed adaptive reuse project site if certain conditions are <br />Oppose unless <br />amended <br /> <br />(further reduces <br />local control, broadly <br />defines adaptive re- <br />use to allow <br />redevelopment of <br />portions of the site <br />adjacent to existing <br />building, limits ability <br />to require payment <br />of impact fees) <br />None/Pending <br />Page 71 of 448
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.