AMENDED AGENDA PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

P24-0291, 6455 Owens Drive, Suite 500 Planning Commission 8 of 9 • The City shall have the right to review the project again to add mitigating conditions should any future complaints regarding noise levels occur. Such conditions could include reducing the number of people allowed in the building at any one time, modifying the hours of operation, and requiring additional soundproofing of the subject building. With the inclusion of the recommended conditions above , staff has determined it is unlikely the noise produced by the proposed use would adversely affect adjacent tenant spaces or be in excess of 75 dBA at any point outside of the property plane as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Therefore, staff does not believe the proposed use would be disruptive to existing or future neighboring businesses/tenants. As stated above, other fitness-related uses have been operating within the area and other similar land use settings such as Valley Business Park or Hacienda for a number of years with no issues reported to the City. Signage No signage is proposed at this time. If the applicant elects to add signage, the proposed signage would be required to adhere to the sign guidelines prescribed by the Municipal Code. Any deviations would require a separate Sign Design Review application to be submitted to the City for consideration. ALTERNATIVES As articulated above, staff believes the proposed use, as conditioned, would be consistent with the objectives of the zoning district. However, alternatives that could be considered by the Planning Commission include: 1. Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from operating the gymnasium; or 2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the CUP, but with modified hours of operation and/or other changes to the proposal. Staff is able to support the findings to approve the proposed use, as proposed, and believes the project would not adversely impact any existing on-site uses or the surrounding area; thus, staff suggests neither of the two project alternatives above should be pursued. PUBLIC NOTICE Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the subject parcel and published in the newspaper. At the time this report was published, staff had not received any public comments. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT This project is categorically exempt (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no environmental document accompanies this report. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION As proposed and conditioned, staff believes the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding businesses and will not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses. Conditions of approval have been included which would ensure the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained.