Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> Managing Tomorrow’s Resources Today <br /> <br /> <br />ZeeLaura Page <br />May 8, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br />Overview <br />Road maintenance is based on deterioration. While roads will deteriorate if simply left unused, most <br />deterioration is associated with use. The damage caused by vehicles increases much more than <br />proportionately with size and weight. Hence, maintenance costs are greater for trips made by heavy <br />vehicles. A single, large truck can cause as much damage as thousands of automobiles, and a truck’s <br />configuration can affect the amount of damage as well. If the load is spread over more axles, allowing for <br />less weight on each wheel, then damage is reduced.1 Refuse Vehicles are generally some of the heaviest <br />vehicles regularly operating on City streets. Accordingly, these vehicles contribute significantly to the cost of <br />maintaining those streets. <br />Generally speaking, the City’s streets are in good shape (with and Average PCI of 67); however, assuring <br />adequate future funding for an effective pavement management program is one of the most financially <br />prudent steps the City can take. Rapid deterioration of pavement typically occurs after roadways drop to a <br />PCI score of 60 or lower;2 therefore, assuring adequate funding for an effective pavement management <br />program for the City’s streets is critical. Delays in preventative maintenance increase the quantity and <br />severity of pavement defects, and result in higher costs during pavement life. Consequently, using only a <br />routine and reactive approach will considerably increase the life cycle costs of the pavement. 3 <br />Background <br />Pleasanton Garbage Service provides collection services for solid waste, recycling, and organics exclusively <br />for residential and commercial customers in the City. <br />Residential solid waste, recycling, and organics are collected in an automated, side-loading, vehicles that <br />collects materials from all customers on each side of each street in a single pass. <br />Commercial collection service is provided in varying frequencies to customers by front-loading vehicles. To <br />be conservative in our estimates, we have assumed these vehicles service the average commercial customer <br />account 1 time per week. <br />Approach <br />Our analysis is based on the City ’s projected Average Annual Expenditures and allocates the Average Annual <br />Expenditures attributed to the impacts of Refuse Vehicles on the City ’s streets. The basis for allocating the <br />Average Annual Expenditures is made by calculating the Equivalent Single Axle Load (ESAL) of each type of <br />vehicle traveling on the City ’s streets, as described below. <br />The weight and loading of Refuse Vehicles impose a particular, specific, and quantifiable impact on streets. <br />The analysis is based on the fact that the City ’s streets are designed to handle a certain amount of vehicle <br /> <br />1 Rufolo, Cost-Based Road Taxation, Cascade Policy Institute, Policy Perspective #5, November 1995. <br />2 Metropolitan Transportation Commission, “Current Issues in Pavement Maintenance and Management.” July 2002. <br />3 A Pavement Preventative Maintenance Program; Larry Galehouse, P.E., L.S.; Michigan Department of Transportation. <br />Page 44 of 720