My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL CLOSED SESSION
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
0521
>
SUPPLEMENTAL CLOSED SESSION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2024 4:26:45 PM
Creation date
5/21/2024 4:26:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/21/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the General Plan,the General Plan then defers to the applicable Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD),not only contradicts the intent of the HAA but actively works <br />against its purpose–i.e.,to increase housing. <br />Under the second sentence of subdivision (j)(4),which City staff have continuously <br />failed to acknowledge and which was not addressed in the Planning Commission’s <br />staff report,even if the zoning standards are consistent with the General Plan,the City <br />is still required to facilitate and accommodate the Project at its proposed and allowed <br />general plan density unless it makes findings of an adverse impact to public health <br />and safety.Again,the General Plan rules regardless of whether the zoning and <br />General Plan are consistent. <br />The inclusion of the phrase “[i]f the local agency has complied with paragraph (2)” <br />(Gov.Code,§65589.5,subdivision (j)(4)),makes clear that while the first sentence of <br />subdivision (j)(4)instructs cities on what to do if their zoning and General Plan are <br />inconsistent,the second sentence instructs cities on what to do if they are consistent. <br />Compliance with subdivision (j)(2)refers to the local agency notifying the developer of <br />any inconsistencies with the zoning or general plan.As such,this would render the <br />second sentence purposeless and redundant if interpreted to be a continuation of the <br />circumstances put forth in the first sentence (i.e.,where the zoning and general plan <br />are inconsistent).This is because compliance with paragraph (2)would simply allow <br />the city to apply the standards and criteria of any categories in the zoning (so long as <br />they do not interfere with the density proposed by the developer),which it would be <br />able to do anyway. <br />Instead,the second sentence sets out what cities must do in the event that their <br />zoning is consistent with their general plan:the City is required to facilitate and <br />accommodate the proposed project at its proposed and allowed general plan density. <br />Yes In My Back Yard <br />2261 Market Street STE 10416 <br />San Francisco,CA 94114 <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.