AGENDA FULL PACKET - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-2024-11 Page Two 3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character; 4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and passersby through the community; 5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, provide shade, and conform to established streetscape; 6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and adjoining landscape; 7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings; 8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and 9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in relationship to the site and landscape. With respect to the above criteria, the Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned, would preserve and enhance the City’s aesthetic values and ensure the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare since the proposed project is consistent with the allowable height, setbacks and other pertinent development standards of the PUD-LDR and subject to the R-1-40,000 District development standards in which it is located. The lighting is designed to harmonize with its surroundings, providing adequate illumination for the tennis courts while minimizing glare and light spillage to adjacent areas. The shielded downward-directed tennis court lighting would be consistent with other existing sports court lighting in the surrounding area and in conformance with the location and size in relation to the existing tennis court. Section 3: The Planning Commission hereby approves Case No. P24-0278, an Administrative Design Review to install six tennis court lights, not to exceed 15 feet in height, at 2207 Martin Avenue, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated into this resolution by reference. Section 4: This resolution shall become effective immediately. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton at a regular meeting held on May 22, 2024, by the following vote: