Laserfiche WebLink
P24-0198, 1262 Quarry Lane, Suite A Planning Commission <br />7 of 7 <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />As articulated above, staff believes the proposed use, as conditioned, is consistent with the <br />objectives of the zoning district. However, alternatives that could be considered by the <br />Planning Commission include: <br /> <br />1. Denial of the application. Such an action would preclude the applicant from operating <br />the tutoring facility; or <br />2. Approval of the CUP with modifications. The Planning Commission could approve the <br />CUP, but with modified hours of operation and/or other changes to the proposal. <br /> <br />Staff is able to support the findings to approve the project, as proposed, and believes the <br />project will not adversely impact any existing on-site uses or the surrounding area; thus, staff <br />suggests neither of the two project alternatives above should be pursued. <br /> <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to surrounding property owners and tenants within a <br />1,000-foot radius of the subject parcel and published in the newspaper. At the time this report <br />was published, staff had received one public comment regarding the project from a community <br />member who is in support of the CUP. The comment has been included for your reference as <br />Exhibit C. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />This project is categorically exempt (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Therefore, no environmental <br />document accompanies this report. <br /> <br />SUMMARY/CONCLUSION <br />As proposed and conditioned, staff concludes the proposed use would be compatible with the <br />surrounding businesses and would not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses or residential <br />properties. Conditions of approval have been included which would ensure the safety and <br />general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. <br /> <br />Primary Author: Sachiko Riddle, Assistant Planner <br /> <br />Reviewed/Approved By: <br />Eric Luchini, Senior Planner <br />Melinda Denis, Planning and Permit Center Manager <br />Ellen Clark, Director of Community Development