Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3200 Hopyard Road Redevelopment – Transportation Assessment <br />January 2, 2024 <br />5 <br /> <br />Of note, TJKM originally looked at preforming this analysis using the 6th edition of the HCM, however <br />multiple of the study intersections could not be analyzed due to non-standard National Electrical <br />Manufacturers Association (NEMA) configurations. <br />Stop Controlled Intersections: <br />The one-way stop controlled intersection of the project entrance on S. Valley Trails Drive has been analyzed using the HCM 2000 methodology for unsignalized (all-way and one/two-way stop control <br />intersections) described in Chapter 17. Peak hour traffic operational conditions for one/two-stop- <br />controlled intersections are reported as average control delay calculated for each movement, not for <br />the overall intersection. For approaches composed of a single lane, the control delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. Table 4 summarizes level of service definitions for stop unsignalized intersections along with the associated delay. <br />Table 3: Level of Service Definitions for Signalized Intersections <br />LOS Definition Control Delay <br />Range (s/veh) <br />A <br />Very low control delay. This level is typically assigned when the v/c ratio is low and <br />either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is short. Most vehicles <br />arrive during the green phase. Many vehicles do not stop at all. <br />≤ 10 <br />B The v/c ratio is low. There is good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More <br />vehicles stop, causing higher levels of delay. ≤ 20 <br />C <br />Higher delays occur in favorable progression or a due to a moderate cycle length, or <br />both. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart <br />as a result of insufficient capacity during a given cycle) may begin to appear. The <br />number of vehicles stopping is still considered low-to-moderate, though many vehicles <br />still pass through the intersection without stopping. <br />≤ 35 <br />D <br />The influence of congestion becomes more apparent. Longer delays may result from <br />some combination of a high v/c ratio, ineffective progression, long cycle length, or <br />high volumes. Many vehicles stop, the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. <br />Individual cycle failures are noticeable. <br />≤ 55 <br />E <br />Typically considered the limit of acceptable delay. High delays usually indicate a very <br />high v/c ratio, poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volumes. Most cycles fail <br />to clear the queue. <br />≤ 80 <br />F <br />Delays are unacceptable to most drivers. Conditions are considered oversaturated. <br />Arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection (v/c in excess of 1.0). Many <br />individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be <br />contributing factors to higher delay. <br />> 80 <br />Source: Transportation Research Board’s (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual 2000 <br />