My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2024
>
02-28
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 3:21:13 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 3:15:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/28/2024
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. PC-2024-03 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br /> 4 <br />public road design and traffic safety, fire hazards and noise hazards). All public <br />safety measures are addressed through the design and conditions of approval for <br />P23-0177 and the Vesting Tentative Map. The street design is satisfactory to the <br />Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department and City Traffic Engineer. The <br />condominiums will be required to meet the requirements of the California Building <br />Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes and/or requirements. The site is <br />free from toxic or hazardous materials and no earthquake, landslide, flooding, or <br />other natural hazards exist at this site. <br /> <br />7. The design of the subdivision or its related improvements will not conflict with <br />easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of <br />property within the proposed subdivision. <br /> <br />The Vesting Tentative Map will maintain the existing City’s water pipeline easement <br />located on-site. This Vesting Tentative Map provides for easements including a <br />public access easement, public service easement and emergency access easement. <br />The design of the subdivision and related improvements does not conflict with the <br />proposed easements. <br /> <br />8. The restriction on approving a tentative subdivision map on land covered by a <br />land conservation contract entered into pursuant to the California Land <br />Conservation Act of 1965 (Williamson Act) is not applicable. <br /> <br />The site is not covered by any land conservation contract, including a Williamson Act <br />contract. <br /> <br />9. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision would not result in <br />violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water <br />Quality Control Board (RWQCB). <br /> <br />No discharge violation currently exists and sewer capacity is available for this <br />subdivision. The project would not discharge any waste other than domestic <br />sewage and all sewage would be discharged into the city’s sanitary sewer system <br />for ultimate treatment. Stormwater runoff would be collected and conveyed through <br />bio-retention basins. Urban stormwater runoff is required to meet the City’s RWQCB <br />permit requirements for urban development. <br /> <br />Findings Pursuant to Government Code Section 65863 (No Net Loss) <br />The proposed project would include 48 above-moderate income units and 9 lower-income <br />apartment units; in comparison, the inventory of sites included in the 6th Cycle Housing <br />Element projected that this site (listed as APN 941 090706200 in Table B-14) would <br />provide up to 44 moderate income units. The project would provide 9 more lower-income <br />units, and 48 more above-moderate units than projected in the inventory, but 44 fewer <br />moderate-income units. However, the inventory of sites provides a buffer of 56 units in <br />excess of the City’s assigned 894-unit moderate income regional housing needs
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.