Laserfiche WebLink
PUD-148, 2207 Martin Ave. Planning Commission <br />12 of 14 <br />The subject parcel is adjacent to single-family residences to the north that have a primary <br />structure side setback of approximately 10 feet (per Ordinance 1891) and Dennis Drive runs <br />adjacent to the rear property line. To minimize intrusions such as noise, illumination, and limit <br />any visual obstruction for vehicles on public streets, staff recommends requiring sports court <br />fencing to be located a minimum of approximately 10 feet from any side and rear property line, <br />and to be prohibited within front yards. Staff further recommends limiting the height of sports <br />court fencing and ancillary sport structures (e.g., goal posts) to no more than approximately 10 <br />feet in height; and the prohibition of exterior illumination. Accordingly, staff is proposing <br />modified sports court development standards from those proposed by the applicant/property <br />owners for the subject parcel, which are shown in Table 4 and included as conditions of <br />approval in Exhibit A. <br />The modified sports court development standards recommend by staff will require that the <br />partially built tennis court at the subject parcel be modified to be brought into conformance, in <br />particular to allow the fencing to be located a minimum of approximately 10 feet from the <br />property line. As a result, the applicant/property owners will be required to, at a minimum, <br />apply for an administrative design review application and modify the partially built tennis court <br />may include partial deconstruction). <br />Staff recommendations are based on the subject parcel and developed properties in the <br />vicinity to achieve compatibility with respect to development. The applicant/property owners <br />intend to build their tennis court at the rear of their property closest to adjacent neighbor at <br />3520 Dennis Drive, which is part of PUD-27 (per Ordinance 1891). PUD-27 has a minimum <br />side setback of approximately 10 feet for the primary residence and approximately 5 feet for <br />accessory structures. In addition, the subject parcel is adjacent to properties on both sides that <br />have exiting accessory structures with an approximately 5-foot setback or less (see Figures 4 <br />and 5). As such, staff proposes an approximately 10-foot side setback for sports courts, which <br />would be more restrictive than existing and proposed accessory structures on adjacent <br />properties. However, not more restrictive than the main residence side setback for the existing <br />residence at 3520 Dennis Drive. <br />Furthermore, and derived from the PMC Chapter 18.20 requiring design review for all <br />accessory structures over 10 feet in height, staff’s recommendation incorporates the <br />requirement that sports courts be subject to review per the City’s Administrative Design <br />Review process. The process would allow staff and neighbors to address future concerns <br />regarding the design, location, and height of a proposed sports court. <br />Table 4: Staff Proposed Sports Court Development Standards6 <br />Sports Courts are subject to the City’s Administrative Design Review Process. <br />No sport courts are allowed in the front of residence and within the required front yard setback. <br />Maximum height for ancillary sports <br />courts structures* <br />10 Feet (exception to height on a case-by-case basis by the Zoning <br />Administrator) <br />Maximum sports courts fencing height ** 10 Feet <br />Minimum side yard setback 10 Feet <br />Minimum rear yard setback 10 Feet <br />Measured vertically from the top of the finished grade to the highest point of the play structure (For example: <br />basketball backboard). <br />Measured vertically from the natural grade or finished grade, whichever is lower, to the highest point of the <br />structure. <br />6 Setbacks exclude related flat work.