My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
AGENDA FULL PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2023
>
12-13
>
AGENDA FULL PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2024 3:05:35 PM
Creation date
5/20/2024 3:04:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/13/2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. PC-2023-18 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />PLEASANTON RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN <br />APPLICATION FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DEVELOPMENT <br />PLAN TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 2207 MARTIN AVENUE, <br />AS FILED UNDER CASE NO. PUD-148 <br />WHEREAS, on March 17, 2023, Meenu Gochhwal and Ashish Choudhary <br />(“Applicant”) applied for PUD development plan approval under case No. PUD-148 to <br />establish development standards for 2207 Martin Ave (“Property”); and <br />WHEREAS, the Property is designated Low Density Residential in the General <br />Plan; and <br />WHEREAS, the zoning for the Property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development <br />–Low Density Residential) District; and <br />WHEREAS, environmental review for the project was undertaken with the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration adopted by the City Council for RZ-97-2 in conformance <br />with the standards of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). There are not <br />substantial changes to the project or the circumstances under which the project is being <br />undertaken that involve new significant environmental effects or that substantially <br />increase the severity of previously identified effects. Furthermore, there is no new <br />information of substantial importance which was unknown at the time the Initial <br />Study/Negative Declaration was adopted by the City Council regarding the project or its <br />effects, mitigation measures, or alternatives. Any previously identified effects or impacts <br />are mitigated to a level of insignificance, with the mitigation measures incorporated into <br />the project’s design or imposed on the project pursuant to the conditions of approval. <br />Therefore, no new environmental document accompanied the project; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 23, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly-noticed <br />public hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application, and received testimony from the applicant and interested <br />parties. <br />WHEREAS, on August 23, 2023 with a 5-0 vote, the Planning Commission <br />determined the development plan is appropriate for the site, made the necessary <br />findings, including modifications to the staff-proposed conditions of approval, and <br />recommended to the Pleasanton City Council PUD-148 be approved. <br />WHEREAS, case No. PUD-148 was scheduled for City Council consideration <br />and action on September 19, 2023, but was removed from the consent calendar by staff <br />to be redirected to the Planning Commission in order to review and affirm the motion <br />made at the August 23, 2023 Planning Commission hearing. <br />WHEREAS, on December 13, 2023, the Planning Commission held a duly- <br />noticed public hearing and considered relevant exhibits, recommendations of the City <br />EXHIBIT A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.