My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
041624
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2024 12:30:38 PM
Creation date
4/12/2024 12:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
559
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 1 -0 0 4 2 Arndt. # / <br />The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act <br />[Deleted codified text is denoted in strikeout. Added codified text is denoted by italics and underline.] <br />Section 1. Title <br />This Act shall be known, and may be cited as, the Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability <br />Act. <br />Section 2. Findings and Declarations <br />(a) Californians are overtaxed. We pay the nation's highest state income tax, sales tax, and gasoline <br />tax. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, California's combined state and local tax burden is the highest <br />in the nation. Despite this, and despite two consecutive years of obscene revenue surpluses, state <br />politicians in 2021 alone introduced legislation to raise more than $234 billion in new and higher taxes <br />and fees. <br />(b) Taxes are only part of the reason for California's rising cost-of-living crisis. Californians pay billions <br />more in hidden "fees" passed through to consumers in the price they pay for products, services, food, <br />fuel, utilities and housing. Since 2010, government revenue from state and local "fees" has more than <br />doubled. <br />(c) California's high cost of living not only contributes to the state's skyrocketing rates of poverty and <br />homelessness, they are the pushing working families and job-providing businesses out of the state. The <br />most recent Census showed that California's population dropped for the first time in history, costing us a <br />seat in Congress. In the past four years, nearly 300 major corporations relocated to other states, not <br />counting thousands more small businesses that were forced to move, sell or close. <br />(d) California voters have tried repeatedly, at great expense, to assert control over whether and how taxes <br />and fees are raised. We have enacted a series of measures to make taxes more predictable, to limit what <br />passes as a "fee," to require voter approval, and to guarantee transparency and accountability. These <br />measures include Proposition 13 (1978), Proposition 62 (1986), Proposition 218 (1996), and Proposition <br />26 (2010). <br />(e) Contrary to the voters' intent, these measures that were designed to control taxes, spending and <br />accountability, have been weakened and hamstrung by the Legislature, government lawyers, and the <br />courts, making it necessary to pass yet another initiative to close loopholes and reverse hostile court <br />decisions. <br />Section 3. Statement of Purpose <br />(a) In enacting this measure, the voters reassert their r ight to a voice and a vote on new and higher taxes <br />by requiring any new or higher tax to be put before voters for approval. Voters also intend that all fees <br />and other charges are passed or rejected by the voters themselves or a governing body elected by voters <br />and not unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats. <br />(b) Furthermore, the purpose and intent of the voters in enacting this measure is to increase transparency <br />and accountability over higher taxes and charges by requiring any tax measure placed on the ballot- <br />1 <br />Page 46 of 559
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.