My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
031924
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2024 2:23:04 PM
Creation date
3/19/2024 2:22:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/19/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />2 of 2 <br /> <br />an acceptable alternative affordable housing proposal, the determination of acceptability of <br />such a proposal was not within the purview of the Planning Commission as they took their <br />action. Rather, such a decision rests with the City Council, which will consider the Affordable <br />Housing Agreement at a future date. In review of other recent Affordable Housing <br />Agreements, the City Council emphasized its desire to maximize the inclusion of on-site <br />affordable units, therefore, staff is concerned that any alternative proposal meet the purpose <br />and intent of the IZO, to the maximum extent possible. (The Housing Commission is scheduled <br />to hear and make a recommendation on the Affordable Housing Agreement on March 21, <br />which will tentatively allow the AHA to be considered by City Council on April 16, 2024.) <br /> <br />Given the factors noted above, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 (Morgan voted “no”) to <br />approve both alternatives, based on findings of conformance to the applicable development <br />standards, with approval of the alternative contingent upon the City Council’s subsequent <br />approval of the Affordable Housing Agreement. The Planning Commission’s action also <br />encompassed approval of the Vesting Tentative Map and CEQA findings. The Planning <br />Commission further recommended the City Council consider using Lower Income Housing <br />Funds (LIHF) to support improving the affordability of the proposed for-sale units to be <br />affordable to lower-income, rather than to moderate-income households.1 <br /> <br />Staff notes that, as allowed by PMC Chapter 18.144, the Planning Commission’s decision is <br />subject to appeal to the City Council by any interested party within 15 days of the action. And, <br />also per PMC Chapter 18.144, the City Council may, at its upcoming March 19, 2024 meeting, <br />request a review of the Planning Commission decision at a future City Council meeting. Such <br />appeal hearing or review request could be combined with the City Council’s required review of <br />the Affordable Housing Agreement for the project in April. <br /> <br />Separately, staff has issued a supplement to the March 19 City Council Meeting, Agenda Item <br />2, Actions of the Zoning Administrator and Planning Commission, formally reporting the <br />Planning Commission’s March 13 action on the project. <br /> <br />Please see the following links for additional information on the proposed and revised projects: <br />February 28, 2024 Planning Commission Agenda Packet <br />March 13, 2024 Planning Commission Agenda Packet <br />Supplemental Memorandum to Planning Commission (Applicant-Proposed Alternative) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 The project application was submitted pursuant to SB 330, which limits the total number of hearings to no more than five. <br />The initial and continued Planning Commission public hearing counts as two hearings, and two additional hearings are <br />needed to accommodate the Housing Commission’s recommendation, and City Council decision, for approval of the <br />Affordable Housing Agreement. The Planning Commission’s approval of either version of the project, contingent on City <br />Council action on the Affordable Housing Agreement, minimizes the risk exhausting the total number of hearings allowed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.