Laserfiche WebLink
delay(s) in awarding the project bid, we would not be able to complete the tie-ins prior to <br /> the summer peak demands. <br /> Q: If this is for upgrading the system to accept additional Zone 7 deliveries, and it <br /> now costs $18 million, while two new wells without Zone 7 are expected (based <br /> upon the Brown & Caldwell Report presented 10/17/23) to be $23 million and with <br /> Zone 7 would be expected to be $8-$10.2 million, did staff evaluate other options? <br /> A: These improvements are necessary with or without new wells, as they are needed for <br /> all of the alternatives in the Water Supply Alternatives study and are also identified as <br /> being needed in the capacity analysis and condition assessments that are being <br /> completed as part of the Water System Management Plan. <br /> Q: If we've missed 2024 for additional capacity of water deliveries, have we <br /> considered abandoning that and putting the money to the two new well project <br /> (that may be just a year out) and then staging these upgrades for later? <br /> A: We are managing risk and these improvements are necessary to implement the two <br /> new wells and to manage peaking demands and to address known/current capacity <br /> issues. The water supply alternatives study identified that the well projects could <br /> possibly be completed in 2027 assuming full design was started before the end of 2023; <br /> however, the City would not be able to fully incorporate the PFAS/well study that Zone 7 <br /> is currently completing. The preliminary design and studies are underway and the <br /> current schedule —working in partnership with Zone 7 — is the end of 2028. <br /> Q: What is the total cost of paying off the current loan? Staff notes that we'll save <br /> $17,000 in interest, but what is the total cost to pay this off and refinance? <br /> A: The outstanding debt for the 2017 Revenue Bond is about $980,000 (principal). <br /> In terms of interest expense, it depends on how we structure and repay the debt. As an <br /> example, if we borrow money from the Equipment Internal Service Fund and charge an <br /> interest rate that is based on our current investment return (about 1.5%) with a <br /> repayment period of 3-5 years, the interest expenses are estimated to be $22,000 - <br /> $38,000, with the total payment more than $1 million including principal. Alternatively, if <br /> we repay the outstanding debt through bond issuance, the overall interest expense will <br /> be higher since the debt will be repaid over a 30-year period. In that case, we will issue <br /> two series of bonds. The first series of debt will be about $1 million to pay off the <br /> outstanding revenue bond in year 1. The second series of debt will be for $18 million <br /> with a repayment term of 30 years. Since the outstanding debt will be paid off first, we <br /> will incur more interest cost on the $18 million of debt. importantly, we don't have the <br /> revenue to cover a $1 million debt and $1.2 million in debt service payment in year 1, so <br /> the $18 million debt may need to be structured in a way that only interest payment will <br /> be made in year 1. The issuance costs are also expected to increase by approximately <br /> $10,000. Borrowing from an internal service fund to prepay the debt is a less expensive <br /> option. <br /> -Vo.. <br /> 2 <br />