My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2024
>
011624 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2024 9:54:49 AM
Creation date
1/11/2024 9:52:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2024
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Description of Proposal: <br />We propose to build a 10 ft high sports court fencing for the tennis court that has been built in our <br />backyard. <br />Background: We, the current owners, purchased this property in April 2022 and have been using this <br />property as our primary residence since then. In August 2022, we reached out to Pleasanton City to seek <br />approval for building a tennis court along with a 10ft high sports court fencing and 12ft high LED lights in <br />our back yard. The city gave us the go ahead for the Tennis Court with sport court fencing however we <br />were asked to submit an application for administrative design review to secure planning permit for the <br />lights. <br />Subsequently we undertook the construction of the proposed Tennis Court and the sports court fencing <br />(without LED lights). We also applied for planning permit for LED lights. By early December 2022, the flat <br />work for the tennis court was fully completed and we put in the poles for the sport court fencing (The <br />chain link had not been put in yet). <br />On or around December 10th 2022, we received a call from City Enforcement that our neighbour had <br />complained about the tennis court and we were directed to contact the city. On further discussions with <br />the city, we have been directed to submit this application. <br />We had built the sports court based on following two email communications from Planner on Duty <br />Email dated November 9th, 2022 by Planner on Duty: <Quote Begin> "The property is zoned PUD-LDR <br />and subject to the R-1-20,000 development standards. Per the R-1-20,000 standards, accessory <br />structures are required to be setback 5-feet from the rear setback line and 3-feet from the side property <br />line (see Table 18.84.010)." <Quote End> <br />Email dated August 22nd, 2022 by Planner on Duty: <Quote Begin> "The tennis court would not require <br />any Planning review or permits. The same for the 10-foot-high fence from a Planning perspective, but <br />again it cannot exceed 10 feet at any point. A Building permit would be required for the fence." <Quote <br />End> <br />Proposal: We are proposing to go with the development standards of an established zone (R-1-40,000) <br />with specific sport courts fencing standards. <br />The sports court fencing will have maximum height of 10 ft with other standards as follows: <br />•Minimum Side Setback of 6 ft from side boundary of the property. <br />•Minimum Rear Setback of 10 ft from rear boundary of the property. <br />•Maximum sport court fence height of 10 ft <br />•Sports court will be in the backyard and will not be in the front yard of the house. <br />•The fencing screen will be chain link fence <br />Page 43 of 201
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.