Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No. PC-2023-18 <br />Page Three <br /> <br /> <br />3. Whether the proposed development plan is compatible with the <br />previously developed properties in the vicinity and the natural, <br />topographic features of the site. <br /> <br />The neighborhood includes a mixture of one-and-two-story residences with a <br />variety of architectural styles sited appropriately with its lot. The proposed <br />development standards would be consistent with those for those allowable <br />within the R-1-40,000 zone, which are appropriate for the existing <br />approximately 1.67-acre lot, and compatible with the land use pattern and <br />existing developed properties in the vicinity. With consideration to existing <br />accessory structures in the vicinity, the proposed sports court development <br />standards are compatible with previously developed properties and <br />established development standards of surrounding Planning Unit <br />Development Districts. The subject parcel is flat with mature existing <br />vegetation. As such, the Planning Commission finds the existing single-family <br />residence is sensitive to the existing trees and vegetation on-site. The <br />Planning Commission concludes this finding can be made. <br /> <br />4. Whether grading in conjunction with the proposed development plan <br />takes into account environmental characteristics and is designed in <br />keeping with the best engineering practices to avoid erosion, slides, or <br />flooring, and to have as minimal an effect upon the environment as <br />possible. <br /> <br />No grading is being proposed as part of this proposed development plan, and <br />as such the project would be in keeping the existing environmental <br />characteristics of the of the property. In addition, the flood hazard maps of the <br />Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) indicate the subject <br />property is not located in a flood hazard zone. The subject parcel will drain to <br />the face-of-curb and excess stormwater runoff would be directed into public <br />street storm drains. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this finding <br />can be made. <br /> <br />5. Whether streets, buildings, and other manmade structures have been <br />designed and located in such a manner to complement the natural <br />terrain and landscape. <br /> <br />The proposed development plan does not include the extension of any new <br />public streets. The subject parcel is relatively flat and consists of an existing <br />single-family residence and accessory structures; no significant changes or <br />modifications to the site or natural terrain are proposed. The Planning <br />Commission finds the proposed development plan is sensitive to existing <br />landscaping, maintaining a majority of the mature vegetation on-site. Given <br />the existing single-family residence’s large setbacks, extensive landscaping, <br />and articulated building design the scale is appropriate. The architectural style <br />and detailing of the existing single-family residence is compatible with the <br />existing neighborhood. As such, the Planning Commission concludes this <br />finding can be made. <br />Page 38 of 201