My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2023
>
120523
>
SUPPLEMENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2023 1:20:04 PM
Creation date
12/5/2023 12:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2023
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jocelyn Kwong <br /> —Subject: FW: Gas Powered Landscape Tools <br /> From: Michael <ras5a@aol.com> <br /> Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 2:02 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <citycouncil@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Cc: Karla Brown<kbrown@cityofpleasantonca.gov>; Kellene (Kelly) Cousins <br /> Subject: Gas Powered Landscape Tools <br /> ***[EXTERNAL]This message comes from an external organization.Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links,especially from unknown <br /> senders.*** <br /> Dear Honorable Mayor Brown et al, <br /> I've been following with renewed interest the momentum throughout the Bay Area and the state <br /> regarding, what will eventually be (hopefully) a state wide ban on two-stroke gas powered landscape <br /> maintenance equipment; particularly leaf blowers, weed cutters and lawn mowers. <br /> .a. There is plenty of documentation as to why this is not only a good idea, but a necessity for the future of <br /> Pleasanton and our society as a whole. See Kelly's links below. <br /> What I would like to discuss, is Pleasanton's unique approach to solving this issue. <br /> You see, I have had exactly zero influence in even bringing the matter up for a vote at my HOA meetings <br /> here at Ruby Hill. <br /> Let me be specific: <br /> ISSUES as to why the board here will NOT even consider putting it up for a vote here. <br /> 1) It will pass 100% no problem, but we will be perceived more <br /> "elitist" than we already are. <br /> 2) A ban is CERTAINLY discriminatory against minorities, their families, and basically THEIR survival, not <br /> just an economic hardship. <br /> 3) Our properties are so massive that it will take our landscapers 2-3 times as long to maintain, thus <br /> doubling or tripling our costs, and their rates... by necessity. Particularly if they have to go back to using <br /> a broom and a rake. <br /> 4)They can't afford to retool using electric source <br /> 5) Current battery life technology will not last much more than an hour, rendering these tools useless <br /> quickly. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.