My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-97-26
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1997
>
PC-97-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:33:06 AM
Creation date
11/17/2004 4:43:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/12/1997
DOCUMENT NO
PC-97-26
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-80-16-16D
NOTES
CM&CORP
NOTES 3
APPROVED 2-STORY BLDG
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9. This approval does not guarantee the availability of sufficient water to serve the project. <br />The City shall withhold building permits for the project if at the time building permits are <br />applied for, mandatory water rationing is in effect, unless the City has adopted a water <br />offset program and unless the developer is participating in the program. Notwithstanding <br />the developer's participation in such a program, the City may withhold building permits if <br />the City determines that sufficient water is not available at the time of application of <br />building permits. <br /> <br />10. The quantity of shrubs planted along the west and north sides of the site shall be doubled <br />and shall be installed in groups. The quantity of shrub species shall be doubled for the <br />entire site. The developer shall submit a revised landscape plan with these changes to the <br />Director of Planning for review and approval before issuance ofa building permit. <br /> <br />11. The property owner or its successors in interest (owner) shall enter into a deferred <br />improvement agreement with the City of Pleasant on (City) to provide that: <br /> <br />a. the owner shall either not protest the establishment of an assessment district, or shall <br />affirmatively vote for the creation of the district or other mechanism to pay the <br />construction costs for the 1-680/West Las Positas Boulevard freeway interchange, or <br />alternative traffic mitigation improvement(s) selected by the City Council, depending <br />on the manner of creation of the funding mechanism; <br /> <br />b. the owner retains the right to protest that the allocation of costs among various <br />properties is inequitable under the above-mentioned funding mechanisms; <br /> <br />c. in the event the assessment mechanism appears to impose economically infeasible <br />levels of costs upon the site, the City agrees to explore alternative financing <br />methods; and <br /> <br />d. if, with consent by the owner, Section VIII of the previous agreement between the <br />City and Robert E. Meyer, dated June 22, 1982 and recorded as Document No. <br />82-140679, is substantially changed so that it no longer coincides with the wording <br />of this condition, that this condition shall be superseded by the revised agreement. <br /> <br />The above-stated agreement shall apply to any alternate City program designed to mitigate <br />long-term traffic levels-of-service on north Pleasanton freeway interchanges, streets, <br />and/or intersections with/without the 1-680/West Las Positas Interchange. Additionally, <br />the project developer/property owner acknowledges the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.