PC-97-16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. PC-97-16 Page 2 WHEREAS, after reviewing the facts and considerations summarized in the "CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations" and "Environmental Impact Mitigation Monitoring Program," supporting these findings, the Planning Commission finds that the potentially significant environmental effects either (1) have been mitigated by project conditions of approval or modifications made to the project during the review process, (2) require mitigation by another public agency having jurisdiction, or (3) cannot be mitigated except by mitigation measures or alternatives found to be infeasible given economic, social, environmental, and other considerations; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that although most significant environmental effects have been reduced to a level of insignificance, the remaining, unavoidable, significant environmental effects are acceptable because the project's economic, social, environmental, and other benefits outweigh any impacts which may occur; and benefits are summarized in the "CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations;" and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the amendment to the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan is appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. Section 2. Recommends to the City Council approval of the Amendment to the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan, the application of Alameda County, as filed under Case SPA-95-01, to modify the adopted Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan to reduce the amount of commercial acreage from 103 acres to approximately 40 acres, add 45 acres of new residential land uses at the Medium Density Residential range (2-8 units per acre), and relocate and expand the 17 -acre active use community park to a 33-acre community sports park located west ofEl Charro Road, south of Interstate 1-580, east of the California Somerset and California Place neighborhoods, and north of the Kaiser Sand and Gravel site, subject to the mitigation measures listed in the EIR, Chapter 3, pages 1-13 (dated April 1996) including any changes to the project and EIR as indicated in the Final EIR, pages 1-3 (dated September 23,1996) and incorporated into the conditions by this reference. Recommends to the City Council approval of the CEQA findings for case SPA-95-01 and the adoption of the Environmental Impact Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project.