Laserfiche WebLink
SFR-Rebtrve,nvease in mils at different isage s Commercial Customer-Relative maease in trails at different usage levels <br /> (0-100 CCF{ (0-100 CCR <br /> m <br /> m i eos <br /> ns <br /> If the city validates my findings, it raises concerns about the COS allocation: <br /> o Are specific segments of SFR customers subsidizing the consumption of other <br /> customers? <br /> o Are these anomalies caused by the original tiered pricing structure for SFR <br /> customers? <br /> o Aren't these differences being compounded by the significant year-over-year <br /> increases? <br /> • Another way to visualize the problem is to expand the analysis the city provided for SFR <br /> customers using the following chart: <br /> Single Family Residential Bi-Monthly Bill Comparison with Incremental <br /> Increase to Consumption from 0 HCF to 23 HCF Bi-Monthly <br /> Average Bil-momttNy tonaumption for a <br /> 5200001 SFR Customer is 22 CCF. <br /> sWaao <br /> $sago <br /> Owego <br /> SQOD <br /> 0 S to is 20 <br /> -Curtest Sa SFr 2024 8il -Fv 2025 84 ---FV XM Sil <br /> I have extrapolated this analysis beyond the 23 HCF level and repeated it for the <br /> commercial customer case. While the latter shows a smooth linear increase in cost with <br /> usage, the former suffers an accelerating increase that is harder to rationalize based on unit <br /> costs of service differences. <br />